[HPADM] Summary: Oracle 9i / 10g cluster interconnect

From: Jim Turner (JTurner@hertz.com)
Date: Thu Jun 29 2006 - 11:33:00 EDT


Many thanks to Andy Cranston, James Lonski, Corinne Haesaerts, and James
Perry for their replies.

I can't explain it, and I'm not happy about it, but ... I threw a GigE
switch between the two RAC cluster nodes, and the DBAs said that the
inter-node latency went away. They said Oracle's cache fusion is working
much, much better now. The switch apparently provides some sort of
low-level mojo that tells both NICs that the link is there and ready at all
times. Speculation is that with the crossover cable, the NICs had to
establish a new link each time an attempt was made to use it. It's not
that the RAC cluster didn't work with the crossover cable -- it did. It's
just that it works much faster now with the interconnect going through a
switch.

===========================================
                                                          
 Jim Turner (jturner@hertz.com)
 Supervisor, UNIX Systems Programming
 The Hertz Corporation Worldwide Data Center
 5601 Northwest Expressway, Area 1035-25
 Oklahoma City, OK 73132-5297
 Office: 405-280-6587
 Cell: 405-204-6050
 Fax: 405-290-2547
 Sprint Text: 4052046050@messaging.sprintpcs.com
 Nextel Text: 4053381354@messaging.nextel.com
                                                          

----- Forwarded by Jim Turner/MIS/OKC/Hertz on 06/29/2006 10:19 AM -----
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                        To
                                       hpux-admin@DutchWorks.nl
                                                                        cc
  Jim Turner
  <JTurner@hertz.com> Subject
  Sent by: [HPADM] Oracle 9i / 10g cluster
  hpux-admin-owner@DutchWorks. interconnect
  nl
                                                                           
                                                                           
  06/06/2006 02:49 PM
                                                                           
                                                                           

Although this is not purely an HP-UX question, I hope you'll forgive me for
tapping the brain trust which I've found to live here.

On a two-node RAC cluster, why does Oracle say that a simple crossover
cable is not supported for the cluster interconnect? Oracle insists that
the interconnect must go through a switch because the switch provldes some
sort of heartbeat mojo that the Oracle driver needs. (SQE Test?)

I just want to understand why I'm gonna have to burn two switch ports
instead of using a crossover cable.

Thanks!

(Cross-posted to the ITRC Forums.)

===========================================

 Jim Turner (jturner@hertz.com)
 Supervisor, UNIX Systems Programming
 The Hertz Corporation Worldwide Data Center
 5601 Northwest Expressway, Area 1035-25
 Oklahoma City, OK 73132-5297
 Office: 405-280-6587
 Cell: 405-204-6050
 Fax: 405-290-2547
 Sprint Text: 4052046050@messaging.sprintpcs.com
 Nextel Text: 4053381354@messaging.nextel.com

---------------
This message (including attachments) may contain information that is
privileged, confidential or protected from disclosure. If you are not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that dissemination,
disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this message or any
information contained in it is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply
e-mail and delete this message from your computer. Although we have taken
steps to ensure that this e-mail and attachments are free from any virus,
we advise that in keeping with good computing practice the recipient
should ensure they are actually virus free.
---------------

--
             ---> Please post QUESTIONS and SUMMARIES only!! <---
        To subscribe/unsubscribe to this list, contact
majordomo@dutchworks.nl
       Name: hpux-admin@dutchworks.nl     Owner:
owner-hpux-admin@dutchworks.nl
 Archives:  ftp.dutchworks.nl:/pub/digests/hpux-admin       (FTP, browse
only)
            http://www.dutchworks.nl/htbin/hpsysadmin   (Web, browse &
search)
---------------
This message (including attachments) may contain information that is 
privileged, confidential or protected from disclosure.  If you are not the 
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that dissemination, 
disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this message or any 
information contained in it is strictly prohibited.  If you have received 
this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply 
e-mail and delete this message from your computer.  Although we have taken 
steps to ensure that this e-mail and attachments are free from any virus, 
we advise that in keeping with good computing practice the recipient 
should ensure they are actually virus free.
---------------
--
             ---> Please post QUESTIONS and SUMMARIES only!! <---
        To subscribe/unsubscribe to this list, contact majordomo@dutchworks.nl
       Name: hpux-admin@dutchworks.nl     Owner: owner-hpux-admin@dutchworks.nl
 
 Archives:  ftp.dutchworks.nl:/pub/digests/hpux-admin       (FTP, browse only)
            http://www.dutchworks.nl/htbin/hpsysadmin   (Web, browse & search)


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Sat Apr 12 2008 - 11:02:53 EDT