From: Holger.VanKoll@SWISSCOM.COM
Date: Thu Feb 05 2004 - 06:46:54 EST
maybe useful reading
http://groups.google.ch/groups?hl=de&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=35522AE7
.3E92B2D8%40cse.uta.edu
too bad Kevin Gee isnt on this list anymore
if its true that the vgda on every disk is touched for every synced LP,
then -P could avoid it by updating it for every "NumParallelLps" LPs
-----Original Message-----
From: Green, Simon [mailto:Simon.Green@EU.ALTRIA.COM]
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 12:00 PM
To: aix-l@Princeton.EDU
Subject: Running syncvg in parallel using -P flag
I'll have to re-synchronise an entire volume group on Sunday and I'd
like to
minimise the elapsed time.
Does anyone know how smart the "-P" option is?
There doesn't seem much point in using it if it will lead to multiple
partitions on a single disk being synchronised in parallel. Would I be
better off doing multiple "syncvg -l"s in parallel, so that I can
control
which disks are being operated on?
-- Simon Green Altria ITSC Europe Ltd AIX-L Archive at https://new-lists.princeton.edu/listserv/aix-l.html New to AIX? http://publib-b.boulder.ibm.com/redbooks.nsf/portals/UNIX N.B. Unsolicited email from vendors will not be appreciated. Please post all follow-ups to the list.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Wed Apr 09 2008 - 22:17:34 EDT