From: Marcelino Mata (mmata@MULTIMATIC.COM)
Date: Thu Dec 18 2003 - 13:29:12 EST
Sure,
I get this error message during backups:
11/15/2003 00:42:02 mtcnetbackup aixserver from client aixserver: ERR -
Cannot open file /data/dept2/2345/cad/30F10A.model. Errno =
12: There is not enough memory available now.
Marcelino
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Bob.Kelley@BRINKSINC.COM [mailto:Bob.Kelley@BRINKSINC.COM]
>Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 12:14 PM
>To: aix-l@Princeton.EDU
>Subject: Re: indirect JFS mount
>
>
>can you give a clearer description of what the problem is you are
>encountering with the backups?
>
>Bobby Kelley Jr.
>972-877-5341
>
>
>
>|---------+---------------------------->
>| | Marcelino Mata |
>| | <mmata@MULTIMATIC|
>| | .COM> |
>| | Sent by: IBM AIX |
>| | Discussion List |
>| | <aix-l@Princeton.|
>| | EDU> |
>| | |
>| | |
>| | 12/18/2003 10:55 |
>| | AM |
>| | Please respond to|
>| | IBM AIX |
>| | Discussion List |
>| | |
>|---------+---------------------------->
>
>>--------------------------------------------------------------
>---------------------------------------------------------------
>---------------------|
> |
>
> |
> | To: aix-l@Princeton.EDU
>
> |
> | cc:
>
> |
> | Subject: indirect JFS mount
>
> |
>
>>--------------------------------------------------------------
>---------------------------------------------------------------
>---------------------|
>
>
>
>
>We use Netbackup to backup our AIX server and we are
>encountering problems
>which Veritas says can be fixed by us changing our JFS mount option to
>"multiple indirect addressing". Using a command like this "chfs -a
>options=rw,mind /fsname".
>
>
>I am concerned about any negative aspects of changing the default mount
>options on a production server. I have a very low confidence level with
>Veritas's knowledge of AIX filesystems. Has anyone else made changes to
>their systems and can they comment on the pro's and cons' of
>indirect mount
>options?
>
>
>Marcelino
>
>
>NOTICE TO BRINK'S EMPLOYEES:
>All electronic mail communications composed, sent, received or
>stored on or
>through Brink's equipment are subject to the Brink's Electronic
>Communications Policy. Employees should have no expectation
>of privacy in
>their use of the Company's electronic mail system.
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Wed Apr 09 2008 - 22:17:25 EDT