From: justin.bleistein@SUNGARD.COM
Date: Tue Jan 28 2003 - 10:12:25 EST
Could you expand more on: "mount groups", what is this?. Thanks!.
--Justin Richard Bleistein
Unix Systems Administrator (Sungard eSourcing)
Desk: (856) 866 - 4017
Cell: (856) 912 - 0861
Email: justin.bleistein@sungard.com
Bruce Zimmer
<b.r.zimmer@WORLDN To: aix-l@Princeton.EDU
ET.ATT.NET> cc:
Sent by: IBM AIX Subject: Re: importvg & /etc/filesystems
Discussion List
<aix-l@Princeton.E
DU>
01/28/2003 08:06
AM
Please respond to
IBM AIX Discussion
List
I would consider setting up mount groups. Then mount the first level
followed by the second level, rather than a mount all. This will
eliminate the need to have the /etc/filesystem file in any specific
order.
Bruce Zimmer
Central Data Systems
(248) 615-4644 (direct)
(248) 705-9231 (cell)
bzimmer@centraldata.com
-----Original Message-----
From: IBM AIX Discussion List [mailto:aix-l@Princeton.EDU] On Behalf Of
Andrew Garnett
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 7:11 AM
To: aix-l@Princeton.EDU
Subject: importvg & /etc/filesystems
Hello,
during a failover exercise I ran an exportvg/importvg
to move disk VGs between machines and back again. All
worked fine.
However, we hit a problem whereby the importvg brought
the filesystems back into /etc/filesystems in a
different order. As we happen to have mount points
below mount points, a "mount all" caused the lowest
mount points to be unavailable.
I realise it's not recommended to have these mount
points, and/or I can re-edit the /etc/filesystems
afterwards, and/or I can mount them explicitly. My
question is - if I want it to be more automatic,
anyone know of a way to control the order they are
loaded back into /etc/filesystems ? (or has anyone
dealt with this before)
Cheers,
A
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts
http://uk.my.yahoo.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Wed Apr 09 2008 - 22:16:32 EDT