SUMMARY: V4.0F->V4.0G upgrade - kernel build problem

From: duncan (duncan.webbe@hp.com)
Date: Mon Apr 19 2004 - 14:48:31 EDT


Resolved this myself an hour or so after I posted it.

This system used to go by another name and, related to this in some twisted
way, were
the following erroneous files:
/sys/newhostname -> /usr/sys/oldhostname #symlink
/usr/sys/oldhostname #directory

I removed these (and recreated the symlink to point to /usr/sys/newhostname
and doconfig ran successfully.

Regards
Duncan

----- Original Message -----
From: "duncan" <duncan.webbe@hp.com>
To: <tru64-unix-managers@ornl.gov>
Sent: Saturday, April 17, 2004 5:40 PM
Subject: V4.0F->V4.0G upgrade - kernel build problem

> This morning I attempted to upgrade an ES40 from V4.0F to V4.0G (on the
way
> to V5.1B-1) using 'installupdate -i <cdrom device>'. The box has LSM root
> mirrors (and I created a third mirror to a disk hanging off an HSZ80
> controller just incase I have to rollback - this disk has been physically
> removed from the system).
>
> All appeared to go well...
>
> "107 of 107 subset(s) installed successfully."
> &
> 09:52:04 Merge completed successfully.
> 09:52:24
> 09:52:24 Merging /etc/sysconfigtab
> 09:52:25 Merge completed successfully.
> 09:52:26 disklabel: -: No such file or directory
> 09:52:26 disklabel: -: No such file or directory
> 09:52:26 disklabel: -: No such file or directory
> 09:52:26 disklabel: -: No such file or directory
>
> (not sure what to make of the disklabel business, only noticed this now).
>
> Until this part,
>
> "10:04:27 *** KERNEL CONFIGURATION AND BUILD PROCEDURE ***"
>
> where all kernel options were selected. At this point the following
> "Working..." messages timestamped in increments of 2 minutes were observed
> for the next three hours until we powercycled the box.
>
>
> 10:14:26 *** PERFORMING KERNEL BUILD ***
> 10:14:39 Working....Sat Apr 17 10:14:12 EST 2004
> 10:16:39 Working....Sat Apr 17 10:16:12 EST 2004
> 10:18:39 Working....Sat Apr 17 10:18:13 EST 2004
> .
> .
> .
> 13:18:50 Working....Sat Apr 17 13:18:23 EST 2004
>
>
> I'm wondering what we might have done wrong here?
> Any help would be immensely appreciated.
>
> Thanking you
> Duncan
>
> duncanwebbe@hotmail.com
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Sat Apr 12 2008 - 10:49:56 EDT