SUMMARY: tcbhashsize

From: Chris.Bryant@DTAG.Com
Date: Mon Jan 19 2004 - 11:42:57 EST

• Next message: Daniel Clar: "SUMMARY : mcutil supported or not supported ?"
• Previous message: Levi Ashcol: "[SUMMARY] (Not Resolved) LSM Basic question !"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Thanks to Chris Eubank, Dr. Thomas Blinn, Kris Smith, Mike Broderick, Nikola
Milutinovic, and Tim Cutts for their responses. I discovered that the
problem was a duplex missmatch with the server and the router. This problem
was fixed and my data transfers are running at expected speeds.

Thanks again

Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Bryant
Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 3:13 PM
To: tru64-unix-managers@ornl.gov
Subject: tcbhashsize

Admins,

        We are currently transfering about 100GB of data over NFS and is
running extreamly slow. Also in /var/adm/messages we are getting Mon dd
hh:mm:ss hosta vmunix: NFS3 server hostb not responding still trying. No in
packet errors or outpacket errors on the nic cards. I saw a posting in the
archives that stated possibly bumping up the inet:tcbhashsize from 512 to
2048. Does anyone see this as a problem or know of any ramifications?

TIA,

Chris Bryant
Senior Systems Administrator
Dollar Thrifty Automotive Group
(918) 669-3213

• Next message: Daniel Clar: "SUMMARY : mcutil supported or not supported ?"
• Previous message: Levi Ashcol: "[SUMMARY] (Not Resolved) LSM Basic question !"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Sat Apr 12 2008 - 10:49:49 EDT