Update: Storedge D2 split-bus problem

From: Wong, Ivan (Ivan.Wong@fujitsu.com.au)
Date: Sun Dec 08 2002 - 23:17:39 EST


Hi,

I have managed to get the disk names to change to c4t8d0-c4t13d0 by
turning the D2 off and on.

However, format command still shows the old disks names (t0-t5) as well
as the new names. The command shows the old disks c4t0d0-c4t5d0 are
'drive not available: formatting'.

Will a "devfsadm -C" get rid of the old disks names in shown in format
or is a reconfiguration reboot the preferred solution?

Thanks in advance.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wong, Ivan
> Sent: Friday, 6 December 2002 4:41 PM
> To: sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
> Subject: Storedge D2 split-bus problem
>
>
> Hi,
>
> We are trying to configure a split bus configuration with 2 ESMs and 2
> hosts on a D2. The 2 hosts are a v880 and a 280r running on
> solaris 8.
> There are 8 disks in the D2, 6 for ESM0 and 2 for ESM1.
>
> During installation, power to the D2 was kept on. The
> customer insisted
> on keeping the power on to the D2 for some reason.
>
> The D2 initially had one ESM connected to the v880. A second ESM was
> then installed into the D2 (whilst still powered on). The
> Configuration
> Options Switch 1 was later set to down as directed in the manual.
>
> So, we have ESM0 connected to the v880 and ESM1 yet to be connected to
> the 280r.
>
> Next step was to run the "devfsadm" command.
>
> We then proceeded to check the split-bus config on the v880
> by checking
> if the disk device names changed from cXt0dY-cXt5dY to
> cXt8dY-cXt13dY by
> using the "format" command. The device names still remained
> cXt0dY-cXt5dY.
>
> Even though ESM1 is not connected to a host, I believe the
> device names
> on the v880 should still change to cXt8dY-cXt13dY.
>
> Any ideas on why this is so? Does the D2 need to be turned off and on
> to detect the second ESM and to make split-bus switch configuration
> option take effect? Or is it smart enough to do all of this
> on the fly?
>
>
> Have I missed out anything ? If so, any advice would be greatly
> appreciated.
>
> Thanks and will summarise.
> _______________________________________________
> sunmanagers mailing list
> sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
> http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagers
_______________________________________________
sunmanagers mailing list
sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagers



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Wed Apr 09 2008 - 23:25:26 EDT