From: Shyam Kumar (shyamkm2000@yahoo.com)
Date: Fri Nov 15 2002 - 23:44:47 EST
Hi,
I don't know if the problem is completely solved or
my solution is perfectly right, but I think I have
solved it atleast temporarily.
I have backed out the linker patch on the problem
systems to 109147-16. And then the problem got solved.
All other higher versions of the patch are giving the
same problem. I hope that it is a problem with these
higher level linker patches. Now I am working with the
patch version 109147-16 and not having the problem.
Thanks to Drew Skinner and Albert White in giving some
hints.
Regards
Shyam
--- Drew Skinner <drew@airlock.com> wrote:
> Hi;
>
> Back out patch 108528-16 and replace that with rev
> 15. This is a known bug
> at Sun. You don't want to run rev 16 of the kernel.
>
>
> All the best,
>
>
> Drew.
>
--- Albert White - SUN Ireland <albert.white@sun.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can you give me the list of patches on a working
> system and on a broken
> system so I can see the patch differences between
> the systems?
>
> Also can you give me some sample code that exhibits
> the problem you
> describe?
>
> If you have test systems please try backing out the
> libc patch to the level
> it is at on working systems and see if that helps.
>
> Cheers,
> ~Al
Yahoo! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your site
http://webhosting.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
sunmanagers mailing list
sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagers
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Wed Apr 09 2008 - 23:25:18 EDT