From: Lars Hecking (lhecking@nmrc.ucc.ie)
Date: Thu Aug 29 2002 - 15:08:06 EDT
Thanks to all who replied:
Sam Magee
Santos, Ramiro
David Foster
Steudten Thomas
Probable cause: bitrot. I was unable to reproduce this on another Solaris 8
system w/ same patch level, and the problem disappeared after reinstalling
the affected machine from scratch.
Lars Hecking writes:
> Came across this while trying to compile php-latest, and I can't get a grip
> on the problem.
>
> Environment: Solaris 8 02/02, 13/08/02 patches
> Compiler: gcc 2.95.3, Sun Forte 6 update 2
> /usr/ccs/bin tools. i.e. not GNU binutils
> OpenSSL: 0.9.6g; libs installed in /usr/lib, successful "make test"
>
>
> Take the following minimum code. This is basically the openssl test from
> php's configure:
>
> $ cat ssltest.c
> char SSL_CTX_set_ssl_version();
>
> int main() {
> SSL_CTX_set_ssl_version()
> ; return 0; }
>
> $ gcc -o ssltest ssltest.c -lssl
> Undefined first referenced
> symbol in file
> SSL_CTX_set_ssl_version /var/tmp/ccUVZq9B.o
> ld: fatal: Symbol referencing errors. No output written to ssltest
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
>
> The same happens with cc instead of gcc. The same happens regardless
> whether I compile openssl with gcc or cc. SSL_CTX_set_ssl_version is
> present in both the static and the shared library, so it's not a
> matter of missing/symbol symbol tables:
>
> $ cd /usr/lib
> $ /usr/ccs/bin/nm libssl.a |grep SSL_CTX_set_ssl_version
> [30] | 572| 128|FUNC |GLOB |0 |2 |SSL_CTX_set_ssl_version
> $ /usr/ccs/bin/nm libssl.so.0.9.6 | grep SSL_CTX_set_ssl_version
> [853] | 121396| 128|FUNC |GLOB |0 |11 |SSL_CTX_set_ssl_version
>
> Now the icing on the cake: this works flawlessly on a Solaris 7 system.
> Same compilers, same openssl version.
>
> More icing: when I copy the openssl libs from the Solaris 7 system (where
> it all works) to the Solaris 8 system, the compile still fails.
>
> It's driving me nuts. I am absolutely unable to establish where exactly
> the problem is: compilers, linker, openssl, auxiliary tools (ar etc.).
> It would be beneficial to have a verbose flag for the linker, but there
> doesn't seem to be one (GNU ld OTOH has one).
>
> Any ideas?
_______________________________________________
sunmanagers mailing list
sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagers
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Wed Apr 09 2008 - 23:24:51 EDT