From: venkataramanarao danam (vdanam@yahoo.com)
Date: Tue Jul 16 2002 - 15:43:49 EDT
Hi sungurus
can any one sugget me how to over come this problem
when i ran
ok> boot cdrom
i get error
cant read disk label
cant open disk label
cant open boot device
could any one suggest me what is this error
i apperciate if any one can throw some light to this
problem
thanks in advance
regards
ramana
--- sunmanagers-request@sunmanagers.org wrote:
> Send sunmanagers mailing list submissions to
> sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web,
> visit
>
>
http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagers
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body
> 'help' to
> sunmanagers-request@sunmanagers.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> sunmanagers-admin@sunmanagers.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it
> is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of sunmanagers digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. bootable diskette(1.44M) (fywaters)
> 2. Max File Size (Sajesh Singh)
> 3. Lost Disk (Johan Hartzenberg)
> 4. Xsun takes too much of memory (RaghuNath
> L(Raghu))
> 5. Lost Disk (Johan Hartzenberg)
> 6. Controller Nomenclature on Solaris (Hirdejit
> Singh)
> 7. Controller Nomenclature on Solaris (Hirdejit
> Singh)
> 8. SEMOP (Jesus Merino)
> 9. SunFire 280R - eri2? (Allen Belk)
> 10. pcata, pcmcia flash card (Diego Lelli)
> 11. Temperature overview ? (Dirk
> =?ISO-8859-1?Q?B=F6nning?=)
> 12. Upgrading Solaris on an e10k domain.. (OBP
> version).. (Vincent S. Cojot)
> 13. flash archive extraction (Adrian Flanagan)
> 14. SUMMARY] upgrade obp for sparc 5 [update]
> (Very Pinguin)
> 15. SUMMARY2: sol9/disable RPC? (Nico Wieland)
> 16. Process Size. (devnull@adc.idt.com)
> 17. "POP3" for Solaris 8 (Mauricio Brigato)
> 18. Process Size. (devnull@adc.idt.com)
> 19. SUMMARY: Average Processor Load ? (Erik
> Williams)
> 20. SUMMARY: Sun Cluster vs Veritas Cluster (John
> Lee)
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 15:33:51 +0800
> From: fywaters <fywaters@163.com>
> To: sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
> <sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org>
> Subject: bootable diskette(1.44M)
>
> sunmanagers#,
> I have to backup my unix bootable diskette now,
> but how to make it, I
> could not find the way!
>
> Thanks,
> zhanhui
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 2
> Subject: Max File Size
> Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 03:42:23 -0400
> From: "Sajesh Singh" <ssingh@iisl.com>
> To: <sun-managers@sunmanagers.org>
>
> To all managers,
> Here is a quick question I
> cannot seem to find a direct answer for. On a
> standard UFS filesystem in Solaris 8 what is the
> maximum size for a file ( not file system, just a
> file) ?
>
> thanks,
>
> Sajesh Singh
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 10:31:32 +0200
> From: Johan Hartzenberg <jhartzen@csc.com>
> Subject: Lost Disk
> To: sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a severe problem and hope someone out there
> can help me.
>
> It seems like one of the NT sysadmins by accident
> wrote signatures to the
> SAN disk allocated to some UNIX systems.
>
> My first question is how can I confirm this.
>
> Secondly, is there a way I could try to copy the
> Solaris signature from one
> disk on one of the systems which are still fine, to
> one of these "corrupted
> disks" in the hope that the content of the LUN has
> not yet been erased?
>
> The LUNs were under Veritas volume manager control.
> The systems are a mix
> of Solaris 2.6 and Solaris 8. The disk subsystem is
> HDS 9960 and the LUNs
> are formatted as HITACHI-OPEN-E*5-0117 (the "5"
> varies depending on size of
> the expanded LUN)
>
> Some of the LUNs used to be protected by SANtinel,
> which lost it's
> configuration shortly prior to this incident - we
> still need to work out
> why.
>
> _Johan
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 14:28:03 +0530
> To: sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
> From: "RaghuNath L(Raghu)" <LRaghuNath@Lucent.Com>
> Subject: Xsun takes too much of memory
>
> Hello Managers,
> Xsun processes in sol8 takes more memory than 7 or
> 2.6 , is any one else
> faced the same problem ?
> Is there any patch to this ?
> 15236 root 1 59 0 45M 66M sleep
> 20:58 0.42% Xsun
>
> I will summarise.
> Regards
> Raghu
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 11:06:27 +0200
> From: Johan Hartzenberg <jhartzen@csc.com>
> Subject: Lost Disk
> To: sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a severe problem and hope someone out there
> can help me.
>
> It seems like one of the NT sysadmins by accident
> wrote signatures to the
> SAN disk allocated to some UNIX systems.
>
> My first question is how can I confirm this.
>
> Secondly, is there a way I could try to copy the
> Solaris signature from one
> disk on one of the systems which are still fine, to
> one of these "corrupted
> disks" in the hope that the content of the LUN has
> not yet been erased?
>
> The LUNs were under Veritas volume manager control.
> The systems are a mix
> of Solaris 2.6 and Solaris 8. The disk subsystem is
> HDS 9960 and the LUNs
> are formatted as HITACHI-OPEN-E*5-0117 (the "5"
> varies depending on size of
> the expanded LUN)
>
> Some of the LUNs used to be protected by SANtinel,
> which lost it's
> configuration shortly prior to this incident - we
> still need to work out
> why.
>
> _Johan
>
> --__--__--
>
> Message: 6
> Date: 16 Jul 2002 09:29:14 -0000
> From: "Hirdejit Singh" <hjsingh@rediffmail.com>
> Reply-To: "Hirdejit Singh" <hjsingh@rediffmail.com>
> To: sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
> Subject: Controller Nomenclature on Solaris
>
> Hi,
>
>
=== message truncated ===
Yahoo! Autos - Get free new car price quotes
http://autos.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
sunmanagers mailing list
sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagers
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Wed Apr 09 2008 - 23:24:36 EDT