SF 1280 vs 4800

From: przemolicc@poczta.fm
Date: Thu Dec 11 2003 - 05:56:13 EST

• Next message: ALEMU Abiy: "How to change the contents of files"
• Previous message: jsynclair@scoteq.co.uk: ""The file just loaded does not appear to be executable.""
• Next in thread: Przemyslaw_Bak@pgf.com.pl: "SUMMARY: SF 1280 vs 4800"
• Reply: Przemyslaw_Bak@pgf.com.pl: "SUMMARY: SF 1280 vs 4800"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Is there any doc/link/white paper about comparison of
SF 1280 and SF 4800 from performance/reliablility
point of view ?

Any experience using _both_ servers ?

It seems that (with a few exceptions like domains etc)
both servers are comparable and 1280 is a competitor
for 4800. Any thoughts ?

przemol
_______________________________________________
sunmanagers mailing list
sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagers

• Next message: ALEMU Abiy: "How to change the contents of files"
• Previous message: jsynclair@scoteq.co.uk: ""The file just loaded does not appear to be executable.""
• Next in thread: Przemyslaw_Bak@pgf.com.pl: "SUMMARY: SF 1280 vs 4800"
• Reply: Przemyslaw_Bak@pgf.com.pl: "SUMMARY: SF 1280 vs 4800"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Wed Apr 09 2008 - 23:27:40 EDT