From: Sol Invictus (sol@haveyoubeentested.org)
Date: Sun Aug 06 2006 - 13:02:24 EDT
Ok.. now your adding words to what I was saying.
We were talking about booking a VA or Pentest and what the difference
was.
If a Pentester is caught while testing it is acknowledged and he is
usually given the opportunity to continue as though he had not been
caught. (Because chances are someone will be able to get around
detection given no time constraints.)
And anyway, if a "Bangin Sharp Pentester" is on the job, he shouldn't
get detected anyway, otherwise, he's not as sharp as he should be. ;-P
You are naturally assuming that my ego is getting in the way here. I
beg to differ. My ego has nothing to do with this. I've done a lot
more reading/researching/and testing that many others have.
On Sun, 2006-08-06 at 11:26 -0500, StyleWar wrote:
> So - by your logic - if you bring a bangin sharp pen-tester in, and he's
> caught and his ingress methods are mitigated while still in the footprinting
> stage, that a pen-test did not actually occur... is that it? Or -- if
> physical security is 'pen-tested' and the tester is caught in the parking
> lot without credentials... no pen test existed or occurred eh?
>
> Quit trying to convince yourself of your own dogma and read for
> comprehension.
>
>
> Sol wrote:
> >>
> >> In the hands of a good pen tester, a pen test does NOT have to exploit
> >> vulnerabilities in order to achieve its value proposition.
>
> >If there's no verification of the vulnerabilities using exploits then it's
> not a Penetration test. What part of >penetration don't you understand?
> Anything less is a Vulnerability assessment. Period.
>
>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: StyleWar [mailto:stylewar@cox.net]
> >>> Sent: Saturday, August 05, 2006 7:01 PM
> >>> To: sol@haveyoubeentested.org; 'Mark Ausley, CISSP'
> >>> Cc: pen-test@securityfocus.com
> >>> Subject: RE: Vulnerability Assessment vs. PenTest
> >>>
> >>> I can break it down like legos.
> >>>
> >>> The value proposition of a pen test is an understanding of
> >>> whether the investment into detection and response is at an
> >>> appropriate level.
> >>>
> >>> The value proposition of a vulnerability assessment is an
> >>> understanding of whether internal controls such as patch
> >>> management, physical security etc.
> >>> are adequate given a specific risk tolerance.
>
> [snip]
>
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This List Sponsored by: Cenzic
Concerned about Web Application Security?
Why not go with the #1 solution - Cenzic, the only one to win the Analyst's
Choice Award from eWeek. As attacks through web applications continue to rise,
you need to proactively protect your applications from hackers. Cenzic has the
most comprehensive solutions to meet your application security penetration
testing and vulnerability management needs. You have an option to go with a
managed service (Cenzic ClickToSecure) or an enterprise software
(Cenzic Hailstorm). Download FREE whitepaper on how a managed service can
help you: http://www.cenzic.com/news_events/wpappsec.php
And, now for a limited time we can do a FREE audit for you to confirm your
results from other product. Contact us at request@cenzic.com for details.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Sat Apr 12 2008 - 10:56:35 EDT