From: Green, Simon (Simon.Green@EU.ALTRIA.COM)
Date: Fri Mar 21 2003 - 05:13:01 EST
I've checked this in the past and have it on good authority that it's OK to
remove SP-Attached servers out of sequence. The particular case I was
looking at was with three SP2 Frames (1, 2 and 3) and four attached servers,
(6, 7, 8 & 9). I wanted to remove Frame 6, an S7A.
I'd have to go back and check my notes to see if I actually did that in the
end: the plans changed on a daily basis back then. Let me know if that's
your situation, Anthony, and I'll dig them out.
Provided you do an SDRArchive beforehand, you can't do a lot of harm anyway.
Simon Green
Altria ITSC Europe s.a.r.l.
AIX-L Archive at http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=aix-l&r=1&w=2
AIX FAQ at http://www.faqs.org/faqs/aix-faq/
N.B. Unsolicited email from vendors will seldom be appreciated.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Verzal [mailto:Bill_Verzal@BCBSIL.COM]
> Sent: 20 March 2003 20:43
> To: aix-l@Princeton.EDU
> Subject: Re: SP-Attached S80 Question
>
>
> PSSP documentation suggests that removing an SP node from the
> middle of
> the node numbers is a bad idea. for example if this is node
> 65 and you
> have node numbers before and after it, you may have SDR concerns.
>
> Other than that, spdelnode, spdelframe, etc...
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Wed Apr 09 2008 - 22:16:41 EDT