From: Aaron W Morris (aaronmorris@MINDSPRING.COM)
Date: Thu Mar 06 2003 - 00:38:22 EST
RAID 0+1 is not RAID 10 (or 1+0). The end result is the same, but the
implementation is different.
Here is a great site that discusses combining multiple RAID levels for
speed and paranoid redundancy:
http://www.pcguide.com/ref/hdd/perf/raid/levels/multLevel01-c.html
The site even talks about RAID 5+1 arrays.
-Aaron Morris
At 12:15 PM 3/5/2003 -0600, you wrote:
>RAID-10 is RAID 0 + 1. Generally accepted as the best performed.
>
>BV
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Bill Verzal
>Technical Consultant
>Forbes Technical Consulting
>(312) 653-3684
>bill_verzal@bcbsil.com
>billverzal@imcingular.com (Pager)
>888-428-4025 (Pager)
>MailStop: 27.202B
>
>
>
>
>"Adam Hanel" <hanela@BILLINGS.K12.MT.US>
>Sent by: "IBM AIX Discussion List" <aix-l@Princeton.EDU>
>03/05/2003 12:08 PM
>Please respond to "IBM AIX Discussion List"
>
>
> To: aix-l@Princeton.EDU
> cc:
> Subject: mirroring raid arrays
>
>
>Can some one tell me ?
>
>Would it be better (for redundancy and speed) to mirror a raid 5 array? Or
>to mirror a raid 0 array?
>
>
>We are running a 7025-F50 AIX 4.3.3
>
>-Adam
>
>
>
>**********
>The information contained in this communication is confidential, private,
>proprietary, or otherwise privileged and is intended only for the use of
>the addressee. Unauthorized use, disclosure, distribution or copying is
>strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this
>communication in error, please notify the sender immediately at
>(312)653-6000 in Illinois; (972)766-6900 in Texas; or (800)835-8699 in New
>Mexico.
>**********
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Wed Apr 09 2008 - 22:16:38 EDT