Re: mirroring raid arrays

From: Jolet, John (John.Jolet@MISYSHEALTHCARE.COM)
Date: Wed Mar 05 2003 - 14:42:50 EST


what that means is raid 10 is a stripe array (for speed) that is mirrored to
another stripe array (for redundancy). Raid 5 incurs a penalty on write
because the parity information has to be calculated. In practice, I don't
see much performance difference between my raid 5 and my raid 10 arrays.
Raid 5 has a lower disk count requirement than raid 10.

-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Verzal [mailto:Bill_Verzal@BCBSIL.COM]
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 1:15 PM
To: aix-l@Princeton.EDU
Subject: Re: mirroring raid arrays

RAID-10 is RAID 0 + 1. Generally accepted as the best performed.

BV
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------
Bill Verzal
Technical Consultant
Forbes Technical Consulting
(312) 653-3684
bill_verzal@bcbsil.com
billverzal@imcingular.com (Pager)
888-428-4025 (Pager)
MailStop: 27.202B

"Adam Hanel" <hanela@BILLINGS.K12.MT.US>
Sent by: "IBM AIX Discussion List" <aix-l@Princeton.EDU>
03/05/2003 12:08 PM
Please respond to "IBM AIX Discussion List"

        To: aix-l@Princeton.EDU
        cc:
        Subject: mirroring raid arrays

Can some one tell me ?

Would it be better (for redundancy and speed) to mirror a raid 5 array? Or
to mirror a raid 0 array?

We are running a 7025-F50 AIX 4.3.3

-Adam

**********
The information contained in this communication is confidential, private,
proprietary, or otherwise privileged and is intended only for the use of the
addressee. Unauthorized use, disclosure, distribution or copying is
strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify the sender immediately at
(312)653-6000 in Illinois; (972)766-6900 in Texas; or (800)835-8699 in New
Mexico.
**********



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Wed Apr 09 2008 - 22:16:38 EDT