From: Theresa Sarver (tsarver.IFMC@SDPS.ORG)
Date: Thu Jan 16 2003 - 16:51:24 EST
Thanks so much for all the help everyone...now if I could bother you all one more time...
In reviewing the netstat data from my nodes *I think* (famous last words) that we do have a separate administrative network:
root@c2cwsin:/>netstat -in
Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Opkts Oerrs Coll
en0 1500 link#2 0.6.x.x.x.x 767699 0 527632 0 0
en0 1500 196.x.x 196.x.x.x 767699 0 527632 0 0
en2 1500 link#3 0.6.x.x.x.x 281844 0 39614 0 0
en2 1500 192.x.x 192.x.x.x 281844 0 39614 0 0
lo0 16896 link#1 143408 0 144205 0 0
lo0 16896 127 127.0.0.1 143408 0 144205 0 0
lo0 16896 ::1 143408 0 144205 0 0
root@c2f1n1ex:/>netstat -in
Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Opkts Oerrs Coll
en0 1500 link#2 0.60.x.x.x.x 866610 0 751467 0 0
en0 1500 196.x.x 196.x.x.x 866610 0 751467 0 0
en1 1500 link#3 0.6.x.x.x.x 415190 0 139462 0 0
en1 1500 192.x.x 192.x.x.x 415190 0 139462 0 0
css0 65520 link#4 6658861 0 11285279 0 0
css0 65520 197.x.x 197.x.x.x 6658861 0 11285279 0 0
lo0 16896 link#1 125360 0 126991 0 0
lo0 16896 127 127.0.0.1 125360 0 126991 0 0
lo0 16896 ::1 125360 0 126991 0 0
tsarver@c2f1n3ex:/home/tsarver> netstat -in
Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Opkts Oerrs Coll
en0 1500 link#2 0.60.x.x.x.x 919693 0 637624 0 0
en0 1500 196.x.x 196.x.x.x 919693 0 637624 0 0
en1 1500 link#3 0.6.x.x.x.x 29020218 0 31355417 0 0
en1 1500 192.x.x 192.x.x.x 29020218 0 31355417 0 0
css0 65520 link#4 2326053 0 2601402 0 0
css0 65520 197.x.x 197.x.x.x 2326053 0 2601402 0 0
lo0 16896 link#1 73511 0 73868 0 0
lo0 16896 127 127.0.0.1 73511 0 73868 0 0
lo0 16896 ::1 73511 0 73868 0 0
So if I am correct in assuming our external traffic is on en1 and our administrative traffic is on en0 then I should not have to delete/recreate any nodes -- right?
Thank you!
Theresa
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Wed Apr 09 2008 - 22:16:29 EDT