From: Bernie Pannell (berniepannell@HOTMAIL.COM)
Date: Mon Jan 06 2003 - 21:03:19 EST
The I/O overhead associated with raid_5 & its parity requirements make it a
no-no on disk intensive operations.
Turns out the 14104500 adapter *only* supports raid_5 & that they'd need to
replace it to support hardware raid_10.
Thanks anyway...
----Original Message Follows----
From: "Jeff Barratt" <jbarratt@compsat.com>
would you achieve the desired results by building 2 raid5 arrays and
mirroring them through the LVM via mklvcopy of all LVs or mirrorvg(if it's a
whole VG)?
I guess my question is what is the major benefit of native raid10 vs 2
mirrored raid 5 arrays. I suppose managability may be an issue, but I would
think that flexibility is gained through 2 raid arrays
-----Original Message-----
From: Bernie Pannell
I cannot seem to use a raid level other than raid_5 on my 4330_09 system.
trying to create a raid_10 array:
# ssaraid -C -l ssa0 -t raid_10 -s pdisk4 pdisk5 pdisk6 pdisk7
ssaraid: Unknown create type: raid_10
_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Wed Apr 09 2008 - 22:16:27 EDT