From: Raj Atwal (tatwal@YAHOO.COM)
Date: Mon Jun 17 2002 - 10:01:28 EDT
Yes it would make sense and this is exactly what I was
trying to do. Many thanks to all that replied.
Raj Atwal
--- "Jolet, John" <John.Jolet@MISYSHEALTHCARE.COM>
wrote:
> you'd think that having your primary and copies on
> seperate loops would make
> sense, so that you'd still have the array if the
> adapter fails.....but you
> can't cross a loop.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Raj Atwal [mailto:tatwal@YAHOO.COM]
> Sent: Sunday, June 16, 2002 9:40 PM
> To: aix-l@Princeton.EDU
> Subject: RAID 10
>
>
> Is it possible to configure hardware RAID 10 over 2
> SSA loops. I have been told that this is not a valid
> configuration for RAID 10. For instance to have the
> primary copy over loop A and the secondary copy over
> loop B. Appreciate any information.
>
> TIA
>
> R. Atwal
>
> =====
> Raj Atwal
> Senior Systems Consultant
> Braegen Group Inc.
> 67 Yonge Street
> Toronto
> Ontario
> (416) 366 6363
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
> http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com
=====
Raj Atwal
Senior Systems Consultant
Braegen Group Inc.
67 Yonge Street
Toronto
Ontario
(416) 366 6363
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Wed Apr 09 2008 - 22:15:59 EDT