Re: Thinking about Security rules...

From: David Hawley (drhunix@netscape.net)
Date: Tue May 14 2002 - 16:23:51 EDT

• Next message: Stuart Adamson: "RE: NCSec: Local Buffer Overflow in Microsoft's Net Messenger Ser vice"
• Previous message: Mendoza Bazan, Luis - (Per): "RE: Thinking about Security rules..."
• Maybe in reply to: Rhino Bond: "Thinking about Security rules..."
• Next in thread: nonme: "Re: combinations of 4"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

>>Any thoughts on this? Anyone seen a white paper on
>>such a set of rules?
>>
>David,
>
>actually this reminds me of the "Defense-in-Depth" concept
>applied to network/system security, but i may be wrong ;)
>have a look at this one in the meantime :
>http://rr.sans.org/start/primer.php
>
>cheers
>Fred

Fred, A GREAT white paper, really liked it! That is very
much the kind of thing I'm trying to research, only we want
to know if anyone has ever written about automating the
whole thing. In other words has anyone ever written a white
paper about putting together the "glue" to automate all
those elements to work together, proactively?

David

• Next message: Stuart Adamson: "RE: NCSec: Local Buffer Overflow in Microsoft's Net Messenger Ser vice"
• Previous message: Mendoza Bazan, Luis - (Per): "RE: Thinking about Security rules..."
• Maybe in reply to: Rhino Bond: "Thinking about Security rules..."
• Next in thread: nonme: "Re: combinations of 4"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Wed Apr 09 2008 - 22:28:09 EDT