SUMMARY traceroute broken on 5.1A ?

From: rob.leadbeater@lynx.co.uk
Date: Fri Oct 04 2002 - 06:23:51 EDT


Thanks to Steve Copper and Olle Eriksson.
It would appear that there is indeed a problem, which should be fixed in
PK3...

I've just downloaded the documentation for PK3 which states:

Patch 718.00
OSF520-426
Patch: Fix for traceroute command
State: New
This patch corrects a problem where traceroute sometimes failed to
provide responses and finish a trace when the destination host name
was given on the command line.

Cheers,

Rob

 -----Original Message-----
From: rob.leadbeater@lynx.co.uk [SMTP:rob.leadbeater@lynx.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, October 04, 2002 11:01 AM
To: tru64-unix-managers@ornl.gov
Subject: traceroute broken on 5.1A ?

Hi managers,

Whilst digging into a network issue, I've noticed that traceroute appears

to be broken on our 5.1A (pk1 and pk2) machines.

If I do a traceroute on one of my wan sites, by IP address, I get a
result, however doing the same thing by name fails:

gs60 # traceroute 192.9.1.120
traceroute to fel34rt001.lynx.co.uk (192.9.1.120): 1-30 hops, 38 byte
packets
 1 spitfire-rd-router2.lynx.co.uk (192.2.1.121) 2.92 ms 2.93 ms 3.90
ms
 2 spitfire-rd-router1.lynx.co.uk (192.2.1.119) 7.81 ms (ttl=255!)
3.90 ms (ttl=255!) 5.85 ms (ttl=255!)
 3 fel34rt001.lynx.co.uk (192.9.1.120) 28.3 ms (ttl=254!) * 27.3 ms
(ttl=254!)

gs60 # traceroute feltham
traceroute to fel34rt001.lynx.co.uk (192.9.1.120): 1-30 hops, 38 byte
packets
 1 spitfire-rd-router2.lynx.co.uk (192.2.1.121) 2.93 ms * *
 2 * * *
 3 * * *
 4 * *
(interrupt)
gs60 #

I originally thought that it might be a DNS issue somewhere, however,
running traceroute on the name on Tru64 4.0E and various Linux versions
works fine...

Digital UNIX V4.0E (Rev. 1091); Tue Feb 8 15:15:51 GMT 2000
gs40 # traceroute feltham
traceroute to fel34rt001.lynx.co.uk (192.9.1.120), 30 hops max, 40 byte
packets
 1 spitfire-rd-router2 (192.2.1.121) 3 ms 4 ms 2 ms
 2 spitfire-rd-router1 (192.2.1.119) 4 ms 4 ms 6 ms
 3 fel34rt001 (192.9.1.120) 27 ms * 31 ms

Anybody else seen anything like this ?

Regards,

Rob

This message is intended only for the use of the person(s) ("The intended
Recipient(s)") to whom it is addressed. It may contain information which
is privileged and confidential within the meaning of applicable law. If
you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender as soon as
possible. The views expressed in this communication are not necessarily
those held by LYNX Express Limited.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Sat Apr 12 2008 - 10:48:55 EDT