remsh permission denied

uma.bandi@ge.com

--
Life is beautiful
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 20:11:17 -0700 (PDT)
From: Davide <davide@picasso.ucsf.edu>
Subject: NFS server and ipfilter
To: sun-netmanagers <sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.53.0707191957140.561@picasso.ucsf.edu>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Hello,
We installed IPFilter 4.1.x on our Sun Solaris 8 server a couple of days
ago. The machine is running an NFS server and we are trying to secure it
so that only our labs can access it.
Problem is that some of the services (statd, mountd, ecc) are binding on
random ports so we can't have rules on ipf.conf.
Is there a way to 'tie' down those services to specif ports so that I
can
setup the IPFilter rules correctly?
Could not find anything so far!!
Any help would be appreciated!
Thanks
David
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 12:39:26 +0530
From: <santhosh.onkar@wipro.com>
Subject: Problem downloading Sol 10 Cd images
To: <sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org>
Message-ID:
<2C7074A1A040E54DA31B3E72C052FD52074A09B8@BLR-EC-MBX04.wipro.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hi All,
The CDs of Solaris 10 that I had have gone for a toss..
When I try to download CD images its going in an endless loop at sun
site
Is it that sun has stopped allowing the CD images for downloading.
Help in this regard much awaited.
regards,
Santhosh.Onkar
mobile:9900112456
The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments
to
this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and
may
contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are
not
the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy
this
e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of
this
message and any attachments.
WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient
should
check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The
company
accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by
this
email.
www.wipro.com
[demime 1.01b removed an attachment of type image/jpeg which had a name
of image001.jpg]
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 09:31:51 +0200
From: "Gyula Blanka" <blankagy@gmail.com>
Subject: IT8212 pci-ide on sol10 sparc
To: sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
Message-ID:
	<553062700707200031j753d69e3td802f7e832ae0b9f@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hello,
I have a Sun Enterprise 250 server and a pci ide/raid controller with
IT8212
chip, because i need more disk space.
Solaris 10 (SPARC) is running on the server.
I installed the ide card and i attached one disk to this controller, but
the
system is not recognized it.
What can i do, for use this contoller?
Thanks
Gyula
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 14:38:15 -0400
From: Bryan Pepin <bpepin@emc.com>
Subject: Solaris 10, Oracle 10G, Shared Memory Segments
To: sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
Message-ID: <46A10117.2030106@emc.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
 Hello,
Has anyone else noticed the following behavior regarding Oracle's use of
shared memory, specifically around the shmmax (Solaris 8) and
shm-max-memory (Solaris 10). Before we upgraded our servers from Solaris
8, our Oracle 10G databases were grabbing just 1 large shared memory
segment for the database. For example, this is what ipcs said while
running the DB on Solaris 8:
T         ID      KEY        MODE        OWNER    GROUP  CREATOR
CGROUP
NATTCH      SEGSZ  CPID  LPID   ATIME    DTIME    CTIME  ISMATTCH
Shared Memory:
m      19458   0xcf1bb170 --rw-r----- oracle dba oracle dba    790
31138578432 21097 22653 10:47:09 10:47:09  7:52:43      790
After "Live Upgrading" to Solaris 10, and converting all our old
/etc/system settings to the new /etc/project format, we are noticing
that
now Oracle is grabbing the same "total" size shared mem segments, but
instead of just 1, it is being split up into multiple ISM segments?
T         ID      KEY        MODE        OWNER    GROUP  CREATOR
CGROUP
NATTCH      SEGSZ  CPID  LPID   ATIME    DTIME    CTIME  ISMATTCH
PROJECT
Shared Memory:
m        112   0x8c07a648 --rw-r----- oracle dba oracle dba   1043
65536 23260 15444 14:25:28 14:25:28 16:21:59     1043          Oracle
m        111   0          --rw-r----- oracle dba oracle dba   1043
1811939328 23260 15444 14:25:28 14:25:28 16:21:55     1043
Oracle
m        109   0          --rw-r----- oracle dba oracle dba   1043
1811939328 23260 15444 14:25:28 14:25:28 16:21:51     1043
Oracle
m        107   0          --rw-r----- oracle dba oracle dba   1043
1795162112 23260 15444 14:25:28 14:25:28 16:21:47     1043
Oracle
m        106   0          --rw-r----- oracle dba oracle dba   1043
1795162112 23260 15444 14:25:28 14:25:28 16:21:43     1043
Oracle
m        105   0          --rw-r----- oracle dba oracle dba   1043
1795162112 23260 15444 14:25:28 14:25:28 16:21:40     1043
Oracle
m        104   0          --rw-r----- oracle dba oracle dba   1043
1795162112 23260 15444 14:25:28 14:25:28 16:21:36     1043
Oracle
m        103   0          --rw-r----- oracle dba oracle dba   1043
1795162112 23260 15444 14:25:28 14:25:28 16:21:33     1043
Oracle
m        102   0          --rw-r----- oracle dba oracle dba   1043
1795162112 23260 15444 14:25:28 14:25:28 16:21:29     1043
Oracle
m        101   0          --rw-r----- oracle dba oracle dba   1043
1795162112 23260 15444 14:25:28 14:25:28 16:21:26     1043
Oracle
m        100   0          --rw-r----- oracle dba oracle dba   1043
15015608320 23260 15444 14:25:28 14:25:28 16:20:51     1043
Oracle
Has anyone run into this? We are not sure if this is a Solaris 10
problem, or an Oracle issue? Sun Support is saying that have not seen
this before.
Any solutions out there to get Oracle back to using just 1 large shared
memory segment?
My last thing to test will be to put the old shmmax variable into
/etc/system, and reboot to see if that magically fixes the situation?
Thanks.
-Bryan
--
************************************************
Bryan Pepin
Unix Enterprise Systems
EMC Corporation
4400 Computer Drive
Westboro, MA 01580
508-898-4776bpepin@emc.com
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
sunmanagers mailing list
sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagers
End of sunmanagers Digest, Vol 4, Issue 10
******************************************
_______________________________________________
sunmanagers mailing list
sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagers