From: hanumantha rao (hanumantha21@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Mar 21 2006 - 22:45:57 EST
Hi Everyone,
I would like to write the Soalris 10 Certificaion exam. Could any one help
me by sending the Soalris 10 Certificaion documentaion like Volume 1 and
Volume 2 for the preparation.
I am eagarly awaiting for you help it would be great help for me
Cheers
Hanumanth
On 3/21/06, sunmanagers-request@sunmanagers.org <
sunmanagers-request@sunmanagers.org> wrote:
>
> Send sunmanagers mailing list submissions to
> sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagers
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> sunmanagers-request@sunmanagers.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> sunmanagers-owner@sunmanagers.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of sunmanagers digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. OECD February 2000] (Marcos Martinez Garcia)
> 2. difference between a SB1000 and a SB2000, using a command?
> (Erling Kopperdal)
> 3. simple questions about sparc (Genis Pujol Hamelink)
> 4. Backup recommendation (Andreas H?schler)
> 5. NDD Issue (Malahat Qureshi)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 12:33:08 +0100 (CET)
> From: "Marcos Martinez Garcia" <marcos.martinez@alternae.com>
> Subject: OECD February 2000]
> To: <sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org>
> Message-ID: <4167.20.133.1.2.1142940788.squirrel@www.alternae.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>
> Hi mates.
>
> One of our clients have an older aplication that only runs in Solaris
> 2.5.1 one of their boxes an ultra enterprise 1 box has crashed last
> Saturday night.
>
> I have tried to install the APP in a solaris 6, and 7 environment but it
> always crash.
>
> So I need to install a working copy of Solaris 2.5.1 HW 11/97 in an ultra
> 60 box that we have in our laboratory. But when I'm tryng to boot that
> box I can't. After a few research in the net I have found I need the
> Operating Environment Installation CD February 2000 (OECD), which is SUN
> Part No. 704-7076-10.
>
> Can any kind member of this list tell me were I can get one copy of this
> CD. I've asked my local Sun provider but it's an obsolete software not
> longer provided by sun. I also have checked on EBAY and some SUN
> refurbished resellers but seems nobody has this CD.
>
> Thanks a lot from Spain.
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 13:37:55 +0100
> From: "Erling Kopperdal" <erling.kopperdal@ementor.no>
> Subject: difference between a SB1000 and a SB2000, using a command?
> To: <sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org>
> Message-ID:
> <
> 279F3E561F85DF48BD032970AED7CA5F0A47A8@100NOOSLMSG004.common.alpharoot.net
> >
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Worthy group
>
> I have a question regarding this matter:
>
> Assuming that these boxes where not tampered with, ie: no replace of
> cpu's after the boxes were purchased:
>
> The problem here is the 900Mhz cpu's. If it's <900 Mhz it must be a
> SB1000, if it's >900 Mhz it must be a SB2000.
>
> I ran a prtpicl -v on the 900 Mhzs (there's probably other ways of
> getting this info too) at my site, and this showed me that the SB1000
> reported the cpu as UltraSPARC-III and the SB2000 reported the cpu as
> UltraSPARC-III+. Could this be a secure way of identyfing SB1000 and
> SB2000 ?
>
> Regards
> Erling
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sunmanagers-bounces@sunmanagers.org
> [mailto:sunmanagers-bounces@sunmanagers.org] On Behalf Of Leiv Jarle
> Larsen
> Sent: 21. mars 2006 08:13
> To: sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
> Subject: SUMMARY: difference between a SB1000 and a SB2000, using a
> command?
>
> Thanks to Rene Occelli adn Caspar Dik.
>
> In short, it is not possible to see the difference from a SB2000 and a
> SB1000 using a command.
>
> :)
> <Leiv>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sunmanagers-bounces@sunmanagers.org
> [mailto:sunmanagers-bounces@sunmanagers.org] On Behalf Of Leiv Jarle
> Larsen
> Sent: 20. mars 2006 14:03
> To: sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
> Subject: difference between a SB1000 and a SB2000, using a command?
>
> who can I see the difference between a SB1000 and a SB2000, using a
> command?
>
> Uname -a gives me the same output, prtdiag -v does the same. Does anyone
> have any ideas?
>
> Leiv Jarle Larsen
> Konsulent
> ______________________________
> Ementor Norge AS, Skvadronvn. 2, 4050 SOLA Mobil +47 930 33 062
> leiv.jarle.larsen@ementor.no www.ementor.no
> _______________________________________________
> sunmanagers mailing list
> sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
> http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagers
> _______________________________________________
> sunmanagers mailing list
> sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
> http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagers
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 14:03:05 +0100
> From: "Genis Pujol Hamelink" <genis.pujol@gmail.com>
> Subject: simple questions about sparc
> To: sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
> Message-ID:
> <6449d19f0603210503g70953b7fy2b27e276fc4bdd7c@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I'm new to configuring hardware on sparc and have a question:
>
> In order to configure a FC HBA adapter on Sparc is it like in IA-32, that
> you go into the card's BIOS/Firmware to configure the arrays? (I couldn4t
> see any prompt on my server)
>
>
> regards,
>
> --
> Genis
> Skype: genis00
> MSN: genis00@hotmail.com
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 15:40:47 +0100
> From: Andreas H?schler <ahoesch@smartsoft.de>
> Subject: Backup recommendation
> To: sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
> Message-ID: <AF902682-B8E8-11DA-A825-003065CCA582@smartsoft.de>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
>
> Dear managers,
>
> we are looking for a cost-effective backup solution for a small budget
> project (SF 240 and 2-3 Sun Rays, Solaris 10). Any recommendations
> (good experiences)?
>
> Thanks a lot!
>
> Regards,
>
> Andreas
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 15:02:48 +0000
> From: "Malahat Qureshi" <malahatq@hotmail.com>
> Subject: NDD Issue
> To: sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
> Message-ID: <BAY107-F33BAE74F93D56537766585C2D80@phx.gbl>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Folks,
>
> I ran into the issue where I normally run the folllowing command to get
> or find out the speed but for newly build solaris box following is the
> output --
>
> any idea ?
>
> # ndd -set /dev/ce instance 0
> # ndd -get /dev/ce link_speed
> operation failed: Invalid argument
> #
> #
>
> Best Regards, Malahat Qureshi Ph.D. (MIS) ** Ideology is the Wallpaper
> that Covers the Cracks of Logic ** Dr. Sulayman Nyang.
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> From: sunmanagers-request@sunmanagers.org
> Reply-To: sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
> To: sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
> Subject: sunmanagers Digest, Vol 36, Issue 24
> Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 04:34:22 -0500
> Send sunmanagers mailing list submissions to
> sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagers
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> sunmanagers-request@sunmanagers.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> sunmanagers-owner@sunmanagers.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of sunmanagers digest..."
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. SUMMARY: SUN QFE-Card in Sol. 10/x86 on V20z?
> (Harald.Husemann@materna.de)
> 2. Follow-up-SUMMARY: SUN QFE-Card in Sol. 10/x86 on V20z?]
> (Harald Husemann)
> 3. SUN E450 Machine not booting (Hilal Afridi)
> 4. Solaris inetd not honoring the "-t" flag (Johnson, Chad)
> 5. v210's (Robert)
> 6. SUMMARY: Solaris inetd not honoring the "-t" flag (Johnson,
> Chad)
> 7. SUMMARY: Passwd problems (Clift, Robert T CTR K55-Branch)
> 8. Performance - Memory/CPU (john reid)
> 9. SUMMARY: difference between a SB1000 and a SB2000, using a
> command? (Leiv Jarle Larsen)
> 10. Veritas VxVM & VxFS installation files (Mustapa Fadzly-r52428)
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 18:09:20 +0100
> From: Harald.Husemann@materna.de
> Subject: SUMMARY: SUN QFE-Card in Sol. 10/x86 on V20z?
> To: sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
> Message-ID:
> <F031D36CF5CCAC459F3EC1E03876504009BD892E@rohrpostix.materna-com.de>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> <original posting below>
>
> Hi all,
>
> and thanks to Jason Grove [jgrove@wvu.edu] for his response, the only
> one I
> received so far.
> It seems that SUN has discontinued the support for the qfe-card since
> it has
> reached EOL, it's not supported in Sol 10 x86.
> Hm, I think I will have to buy some Gigaswifts...
>
> Have a nice hackin',
>
> Harald
>
> -----Urspr|ngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: sunmanagers-bounces@sunmanagers.org
> [mailto:sunmanagers-bounces@sunmanagers.org]Im Auftrag von
> Harald.Husemann@materna.de
> Gesendet: Montag, 20. Mdrz 2006 12:30
> An: sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
> Betreff: SUN QFE-Card in Sol. 10/x86 on V20z?
>
> Hi all,
>
> I need some more interfaces on a V20z running with Solaris 10 1/06. I
> have
> some ol' QFE-cards lying around, and thought it would be a good
> choice for
> the problem to use one of them.
> Hm... Unfortunately, it's not recognized, so I searched the web to
> get the
> appr. driver. I figured out that I need a package called SUNWqfed,
> but it
> seems this package is not available for Sol. 10/x86?! I can't find it
> on the
> jumpstart, and at SUN's download center, I've only found packages for
> the
> new GigaSwift cards.
> Or, will the GigaSwift driver support the old QFE-card also? Would be
> nice
> to get it working, I don't need Ggabit, so it does not make sense to
> buy new
> cards...
>
> Anyone did this before? Any suggestions where to get driver?
>
> Thanks, will summarize,
>
> Harald
> _______________________________________________
> sunmanagers mailing list
> sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
> http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagers
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 19:21:06 +0100
> From: Harald Husemann <harald.husemann@materna.de>
> Subject: Follow-up-SUMMARY: SUN QFE-Card in Sol. 10/x86 on V20z?]
> To: sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
> Message-ID: <1142878866.25889.18.camel@yellow.materna-com.de>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> Hi agn,
>
> and thanks to Darren Dunham for correcting a little mistake I made in
> my
> last post (Darren's mail is attached below):
>
> Of course, the qfe-cards are still supported on SPARC-based systems
> (I
> have one running fine in a E420 with Solaris 10). But, SUN has
> decided
> not to support them on x86-based systems.
> Btw.: The quad gigaswift is working just fine under Solaris 10 x86,
> the
> appr. driver is part of the OS. I have two systems with QGE-cards
> running here as a SUN cluster.
>
> Thanks agn to the list,
>
> Harald
>
> -----Forwarded Message-----
> > From: Darren Dunham <ddunham@taos.com>
> > To: Harald.Husemann@materna.de
> > Subject: Re: SUMMARY: SUN QFE-Card in Sol. 10/x86 on V20z?
> > Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 10:02:16 -0800
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > and thanks to Jason Grove [jgrove@wvu.edu] for his response, the
> only one I
> > > received so far.
> > > It seems that SUN has discontinued the support for the qfe-card
> since it has
> > > reached EOL, it's not supported in Sol 10 x86.
> >
> > Those are two separate statements that don't really have anything
> do do
> > with each other.
> >
> > "EOL" is when sun discontinues the product. That does not mean
> that
> > they've discontinued support. The QFE drivers are still available
> for
> > Solaris 10/SPARC.
> >
> > However it's not supported on x86 and apparently never has
> been. That's
> > unreleated to the EOL announcement.
> >
> > Casper Dik has posted about porting this driver in the past, but
> the qfe
> > driver is not yet part of the OpenSolaris code, so it can't be
> released
> > yet. I don't know if the situation has changed since his post last
> > year.
> >
> > http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=1921
> >
> > > Hm, I think I will have to buy some Gigaswifts...
> >
> > I don't immediately see any quads on the community NIC driver page.
> >
> > http://homepage2.nifty.com/mrym3/taiyodo/eng/
> --
> ============================================
> Harald Husemann
> Systems Engineer
> Materna Gmbh - Vosskuhle 37 -
> D-44141 Dortmund, Germany
> Phone: +49-231-9505-222
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 23:44:47 +0500
> From: "Hilal Afridi" <hilalafridi@gmail.com>
> Subject: SUN E450 Machine not booting
> To: sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
> Message-ID:
> <e0f1b0480603201044x7df374e9w241ca55dea6b3aff@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Dear Managers!
> I installed a new DVD rom in my SUN E450 server. I have not been able
> to bring it to life after this installation.
> Can anybody guide me through the diagnostics process so that i can
> what exactly is keeping my server from booting.
> Any help in this regard will be highly appreciated.
> Best Regards
>
> --
> Hilal Afridi
> Server Engineer
> Goldbar Enterprises LLC
> Cell# 92-321-5178108
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 13:57:44 -0500
> From: "Johnson, Chad" <CJohnson4@tiaa-cref.org>
> Subject: Solaris inetd not honoring the "-t" flag
> To: <sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org>
> Message-ID:
> <50BFA7C0BA27F345BE28A21B7BE7D33401DC6DFA@CHAPDMSXMB04.ad.tiaa-cref.org>
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> On solaris 9 9/05 (most recent 9_Recommended installed) inetd does
> not
> seem to honor the -t flag. I have modified /etc/init.d/inetsvc and
> added the '-t' flag to the startup line for inetd, also I have
> verified
> the correct logging settings necessary (daemon.notice) is set
> correctly
> to log to /var/adm/messages in /etc/syslog.conf.
>
> No inetd connection attempts are logged. Thinking perhaps the -t
> flag
> was in some way linked to the "ENABLE_CONNECTION_LOGGING" setting in
> /etc/default/inetd I set the value in /etc/default/inetd to
> "YES". This
> did work, connection attempts were logged (following a restart of
> inetd)
> to /var/adm/messages. This led me to think that the flag in
> /etc/default/inetd had to be "YES" for the -t flag to even work so I
> now
> removed the "-t" flag from the inetd startup and rebooted. The
> system
> still logged connection attempts (as it should per the man page)
> because
> of the setting in /etc/default/inetd.
>
> This shows the system seems to completely ignore the "-t" flag to
> inetd
> in Solaris 9.
>
> Has anyone else had success using -t with inetd in Solaris 9? The
> main
> reason I ask is we have a large mix of 8 & 9 systems and I would like
> to
> limit the checks / controls to a single item where possible. It
> would
> be nice to have this control state that "inetd must run with the -t
> flag" instead of having to document separate controls for 8 & 9.
>
> TIA,
>
> Chad Johnson
>
> inetd(1M) From
> http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/817-3937/6mjgeafpj?a=view#indexterm-199
> :
>
> The /etc/default/inetd file contains the following default parameter
> settings. See FILES
> <http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/817-3937/6mjgeafpj?a=view#inetd-1m-fil
> e> .
>
> ENABLE_CONNECTION_LOGGING
>
> Specifies whether incoming TCP connections are traced. The value
> ENABLE_CONNECTION_LOGGING=YES is equivalent to the -t command-line
> option. The default value for ENABLE_CONNECTION_LOGGING is NO.
>
> .....
>
> -t
>
> Instructs inetd to trace the incoming connections for all of its TCP
> services. It does this by logging the client's IP address and TCP
> port
> number, along with the name of the service, using the syslog(3C)
> <http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/817-3939/6mjgg7haf?a=view> facility.
> "Wait" wait-status services cannot be traced. When tracing is
> enabled,
> inetd uses the syslog facility code daemon and notice priority level.
> This logging is separate from the logging done by the TCP wrappers
> facility. See FILES
> <http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/817-3937/6mjgeafpj?a=view#inetd-1m-fil
> e> .
>
> .....
>
> **************************************************************
> This message, including any attachments, contains confidential
> information
> intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by
> law. If
> you are not the intended recipient, please contact sender immediately
> by reply
> e-mail and destroy all copies. You are hereby notified that any
> disclosure,
> copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action
> based on
> it, is strictly prohibited.
> TIAA-CREF
> **************************************************************
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 11:04:07 -0800 (PST)
> From: Robert <rgoud@yahoo.com>
> Subject: v210's
> To: sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
> Message-ID: <20060320190407.70824.qmail@web52406.mail.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Hi list,
> I see these errors on v210 in /var/adm/messages, any clue?
>
> Mar 20 11:13:52 prod1 rmclomv: [ID 211032 kern.error] PSU @ PS0 has
> FAULTED.
> Mar 20 11:29:04 prod1 rmclomv: [ID 211032 kern.error] PSU @ PS0 has
> FAULTED.
> Mar 20 11:44:16 prod1 rmclomv: [ID 211032 kern.error] PSU @ PS0 has
> FAULTED.
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> ---------------------------------
> Yahoo! Mail
> Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing a breeze.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 14:22:32 -0500
> From: "Johnson, Chad" <CJohnson4@tiaa-cref.org>
> Subject: SUMMARY: Solaris inetd not honoring the "-t" flag
> To: <sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org>
> Message-ID:
> <50BFA7C0BA27F345BE28A21B7BE7D33401DC6E32@CHAPDMSXMB04.ad.tiaa-cref.org>
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Ok, so some more searching and I found this
> http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-25-72911-1
> which
> states:
>
> As of Solaris[TM] 9, using the "-t" flag with the inetd daemon is
> superseded by the /etc/default/inetd file.
>
> And then goes on to say:
>
> For further information, refer to the Solaris[TM] 9 inetd man page.
>
> And of course the man page says that -t works. Ahh, the joy of out
> of
> date / inaccurate documentation.
>
> On solaris 9 9/05 (most recent 9_Recommended installed) inetd does
> not
> seem to honor the -t flag. I have modified /etc/init.d/inetsvc and
> added the '-t' flag to the startup line for inetd, also I have
> verified
> the correct logging settings necessary (daemon.notice) is set
> correctly
> to log to /var/adm/messages in /etc/syslog.conf.
>
> No inetd connection attempts are logged. Thinking perhaps the -t
> flag
> was in some way linked to the "ENABLE_CONNECTION_LOGGING" setting in
> /etc/default/inetd I set the value in /etc/default/inetd to
> "YES". This
> did work, connection attempts were logged (following a restart of
> inetd)
> to /var/adm/messages. This led me to think that the flag in
> /etc/default/inetd had to be "YES" for the -t flag to even work so I
> now
> removed the "-t" flag from the inetd startup and rebooted. The
> system
> still logged connection attempts (as it should per the man page)
> because
> of the setting in /etc/default/inetd.
>
> This shows the system seems to completely ignore the "-t" flag to
> inetd
> in Solaris 9.
>
> Has anyone else had success using -t with inetd in Solaris 9? The
> main
> reason I ask is we have a large mix of 8 & 9 systems and I would like
> to
> limit the checks / controls to a single item where possible. It
> would
> be nice to have this control state that "inetd must run with the -t
> flag" instead of having to document separate controls for 8 & 9.
>
> TIA,
>
> Chad Johnson
>
> inetd(1M) From
> http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/817-3937/6mjgeafpj?a=view#indexterm-199
> :
>
> The /etc/default/inetd file contains the following default parameter
> settings. See FILES
> <http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/817-3937/6mjgeafpj?a=view#inetd-1m-fil
> e> .
>
> ENABLE_CONNECTION_LOGGING
>
> Specifies whether incoming TCP connections are traced. The value
> ENABLE_CONNECTION_LOGGING=YES is equivalent to the -t command-line
> option. The default value for ENABLE_CONNECTION_LOGGING is NO.
>
> .....
>
> -t
>
> Instructs inetd to trace the incoming connections for all of its TCP
> services. It does this by logging the client's IP address and TCP
> port
> number, along with the name of the service, using the syslog(3C)
> <http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/817-3939/6mjgg7haf?a=view> facility.
> "Wait" wait-status services cannot be traced. When tracing is
> enabled,
> inetd uses the syslog facility code daemon and notice priority level.
> This logging is separate from the logging done by the TCP wrappers
> facility. See FILES
> <http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/817-3937/6mjgeafpj?a=view#inetd-1m-fil
> e> .
>
> .....
>
> **************************************************************
> This message, including any attachments, contains confidential
> information
> intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by
> law. If
> you are not the intended recipient, please contact sender immediately
> by reply
> e-mail and destroy all copies. You are hereby notified that any
> disclosure,
> copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action
> based on
> it, is strictly prohibited.
> TIAA-CREF
> **************************************************************
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 13:41:07 -0600
> From: "Clift, Robert T CTR K55-Branch" <robert.clift.ctr@navy.mil>
> Subject: SUMMARY: Passwd problems
> To: <sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org>
> Message-ID:
> <
>
EF55D4DBD8632E4D975DA3D296622B5E02647AFF@NAEAMILLEX02VA.nadsusea.nads.navy.mi
l
> >
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> I was troubleshooting this for another admin when the problem
> occured. I have since found out that they have installed SFU 3.5 from
> Microsoft which is a product that verifies the unix passwd with a
> policy on a windows box. The new password didn't meet the criteria so
> a permission denied was returned. Thanks for the input from multiple
> folks.
>
> Original question:
>
> Update:
>
> I do get a permission denied after the "passwd changed " statement. I
> have ran pwconv and checked permissions on /etc/passwd and
> /etc/shadow. I have tried taking the nis out of nsswitch.conf for the
> passwd word line and still no luck.
>
> Original question:
>
> I have a Solaris 9 box running NIS. When I enter the command passwd
> <username> the prompt hangs for about 2 minutes and finally returns
> and accepts the new password. After the re-enter passwd section, I
> will eventually see the message about passwd successfully changed but
> then will be asked to please try again. I have stop and restarted
> NIS.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 17:55:46 -0500
> From: "john reid" <johnreid23@gmail.com>
> Subject: Performance - Memory/CPU
> To: sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
> Message-ID:
> <3348f38b0603201455n1eb673c8se7e973277f8b8c2f@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Team:
>
> I have a server which the users report memory/performance
> issues..Could the
> gurus please guide me how to nail down the issue. I now it would not
> be a
> single command..but a series of steps looking into different
> parameters on
> the box OR may be a DOC. This is a sunfire v 240 server running 2.9.
> Thanks in advance and i will summarise.
>
> Best Regards
>
> John.
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 08:12:56 +0100
> From: "Leiv Jarle Larsen" <leiv.jarle.larsen@ementor.no>
> Subject: SUMMARY: difference between a SB1000 and a SB2000, using a
> command?
> To: <sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org>
> Message-ID:
> <
> F0F7426CC380574795D4DB15551337C404DF19@100NOOSLMSG004.common.alpharoot.net
> >
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Thanks to Rene Occelli adn Caspar Dik.
>
> In short, it is not possible to see the difference from a SB2000 and
> a
> SB1000 using a command.
>
> :)
> <Leiv>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sunmanagers-bounces@sunmanagers.org
> [mailto:sunmanagers-bounces@sunmanagers.org] On Behalf Of Leiv Jarle
> Larsen
> Sent: 20. mars 2006 14:03
> To: sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
> Subject: difference between a SB1000 and a SB2000, using a command?
>
> who can I see the difference between a SB1000 and a SB2000, using a
> command?
>
> Uname -a gives me the same output, prtdiag -v does the same. Does
> anyone
> have any ideas?
>
> Leiv Jarle Larsen
> Konsulent
> ______________________________
> Ementor Norge AS, Skvadronvn. 2, 4050 SOLA
> Mobil +47 930 33 062
> leiv.jarle.larsen@ementor.no
> www.ementor.no
> _______________________________________________
> sunmanagers mailing list
> sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
> http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagers
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 10
> Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 17:34:04 +0800
> From: Mustapa Fadzly-r52428 <Fadzly@freescale.com>
> Subject: Veritas VxVM & VxFS installation files
> To: "'sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org.'" <sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org>
> Message-ID:
> <0B3CDF75128AD5119E0800D0B782934E1DC8FE70@zmy02exm01.ap.freescale.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> Greeting Managers,
>
> We are trying to redeployed our solaris 8 machine with Sun
> Storage A5200 disk array when we found out that we lost the
> vxvm and vxfs installation media. Thank god the server has not
> been formatted yet and we still have the license codes in the
> system.
>
> Is there anyway for me to get the installation files for these
> 2 products? Anybody has them in their archive? We were using vxvm 3.1
> along with vxfs (not sure what version).
> I'm not sure if the license can be used for higher versions?
>
> Thanks & regards,
> -Fadzly
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> sunmanagers mailing list
> sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
> http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagers
>
> End of sunmanagers Digest, Vol 36, Issue 24
> *******************************************
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> sunmanagers mailing list
> sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
> http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagers
>
>
> End of sunmanagers Digest, Vol 36, Issue 25
> *******************************************
_______________________________________________
sunmanagers mailing list
sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagers
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Wed Apr 09 2008 - 23:39:22 EDT