From: Rami Aubourg-kaires (rami.aubourg@ifrance.Com)
Date: Thu Mar 09 2006 - 08:46:22 EST
I said that on Solaris 10, /sbin/sh was still statically linked.
I'm wondering:
On a Solaris 9 machine:
# ldd /sbin/sh
ldd: /sbin/sh: file is not a dynamic executable or shared object
# ldd /usr/bin/bash
libcurses.so.1 => /usr/lib/libcurses.so.1
libsocket.so.1 => /usr/lib/libsocket.so.1
libnsl.so.1 => /usr/lib/libnsl.so.1
libdl.so.1 => /usr/lib/libdl.so.1
libc.so.1 => /usr/lib/libc.so.1
libmp.so.2 => /usr/lib/libmp.so.2
/usr/platform/SUNW,Sun-Fire-V210/lib/libc_psr.so.1
I just got my hands on a Solaris 10 machine:
# ldd /sbin/sh
libgen.so.1 => /lib/libgen.so.1
libsecdb.so.1 => /lib/libsecdb.so.1
libc.so.1 => /lib/libc.so.1
libnsl.so.1 => /lib/libnsl.so.1
libcmd.so.1 => /lib/libcmd.so.1
libmp.so.2 => /lib/libmp.so.2
libmd5.so.1 => /lib/libmd5.so.1
libscf.so.1 => /lib/libscf.so.1
libdoor.so.1 => /lib/libdoor.so.1
libuutil.so.1 => /lib/libuutil.so.1
libm.so.2 => /lib/libm.so.2
# ldd /usr/bin/bash
libcurses.so.1 => /lib/libcurses.so.1
libsocket.so.1 => /lib/libsocket.so.1
libnsl.so.1 => /lib/libnsl.so.1
libdl.so.1 => /lib/libdl.so.1
libc.so.1 => /lib/libc.so.1
libmp.so.2 => /lib/libmp.so.2
libmd5.so.1 => /lib/libmd5.so.1
libscf.so.1 => /lib/libscf.so.1
libdoor.so.1 => /lib/libdoor.so.1
libuutil.so.1 => /lib/libuutil.so.1
libm.so.2 => /lib/libm.so.2
So, it seems that /sbin/sh is now dynamically linked.
Though the safest would still be to put the shell into .profile, I guess.
_______________________________________________
sunmanagers mailing list
sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagers
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Wed Apr 09 2008 - 23:39:15 EDT