ulimit -t don't act as intended?

From: Gerard Henry (ghenry@cmi.univ-mrs.fr)
Date: Fri Jan 13 2006 - 09:43:20 EST

Next message: jason kappy: "HBA recommendation for StoreEdge 3310 JBOD."
Previous message: Eric Voisard: "SunOS, ntpd and 2006 "leap second""
In reply to: Gérard Henry: "script unable to get arguments"
Next in thread: Gérard Henry: "Summary: ulimit -t don't act as intended?"
Reply: Gérard Henry: "Summary: ulimit -t don't act as intended?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

hello all,
i have a wrapper around some apps, as in:
#!/bin/sh
ulimit -t 3600
/usr/local/firefox/firefox "${@}"

but i notice:
PID USERNAME SIZE RSS STATE PRI NICE TIME CPU PROCESS/NLWP
3651 user1 212M 108M cpu2 20 0 21:00:44 11% firefox-bin/4

firefox runs since 21 hours, if i understand well

Where am i wrong?

Thanks in advance for help,

gerard
_______________________________________________
sunmanagers mailing list
sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagers

Next message: jason kappy: "HBA recommendation for StoreEdge 3310 JBOD."
Previous message: Eric Voisard: "SunOS, ntpd and 2006 "leap second""
In reply to: Gérard Henry: "script unable to get arguments"
Next in thread: Gérard Henry: "Summary: ulimit -t don't act as intended?"
Reply: Gérard Henry: "Summary: ulimit -t don't act as intended?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Wed Apr 09 2008 - 23:38:27 EDT