[Summary ] SSL on Solaris 9 -- already there? or not?

From: Chris Hoogendyk (hoogendyk@bio.umass.edu)
Date: Thu Mar 24 2005 - 08:51:41 EST


Not one single response in over 2 days, aside from the out of office
autoresponders.

Absent any further information, I'll simply go ahead with the standard
installation of OpenSSL and mod_ssl.

---------------

Chris Hoogendyk

-
    O__ ---- Systems Administrator
   c/ /'_ --- Biology Department
  (*) \(*) -- 140 Morrill Science Center
~~~~~~~~~~ - University of Massachusetts, Amherst

<hoogendyk@bio.umass.edu>

---------------

Chris Hoogendyk wrote:
> Setting up Solaris 9 on an E250. Nice.
>
> The Sun SSH as delivered seems to be perfectly compatible with our other
> installations including for key exchanges. I've gone through its
> configuration, tweaked it, and decided to keep it.
>
> Apache looks acceptable as well. However, I need to add mod_ssl.
>
> My question is regarding the configuration. Normally, if I were using
> Open SSH, I would have installed Open SSL, and mod_ssl would be
> accessing that. Is there some Sun version of SSL that is already in
> Solaris 9 (for Sun's SSH) and that I could access with mod_ssl? Or is it
> totally built into SSH, and do I really need to go through installing
> Open SSL and configuring certificates for it? Not a particularly big
> deal if it has to be done, I just don't want unnecessary duplications if
> I can help it.
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> ---------------
>
> Chris Hoogendyk
>
> -
> O__ ---- Systems Administrator
> c/ /'_ --- Biology Department
> (*) \(*) -- 140 Morrill Science Center
> ~~~~~~~~~~ - University of Massachusetts, Amherst
>
> <hoogendyk@bio.umass.edu>
>
> ---------------
> _______________________________________________
> sunmanagers mailing list
> sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
> http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagers
_______________________________________________
sunmanagers mailing list
sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagers



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Wed Apr 09 2008 - 23:30:25 EDT