SUMMARY: Solaris x86

From: Tom Grassia (tgrassia@sfnewmexican.com)
Date: Mon Mar 21 2005 - 11:20:55 EST


Cease fire, x86 people!

Damn, I never knew there were that many of you folks out there. Silent no
longer, I guess.

Here's the skinny from the scores of responses I've received.

A. You are very lame to be running two Ultra 2's in production.

Thanks, I already knew this. Hence the whole, "I am looking to upgrade."
thing.

Second. An overwhelming majority of people have come out singing the
praises of x86. Most common opening statement, "It's obvious you haven't
looked at it since 1999." Many people are running/have ran a wide variety
of applications on it. I've seen a ton of production websites/primary
DNS/MX records listed as examples.

That sounds great, but I haven't seen any answers mentioning running
multiple relational db's on a box. Since the apps I'm working with are
basically massive front ends to a ton of Progress Db's
(http://www.pbs.com), it makes me a bit concerned about putting it on
x86. On the other hand, now I have no worries about using it for some of
the purposes I've seen detailed in the replies of many people.

3rd. One person swears x86 is a tool of Satan. We're all being deceived!

Umm, thanks guy. Rock on.

Next. The big deal to keep in mind is this: always use hardware Sun has
certified as being able to run x86. I received numerous admonishments to
not skimp on hardware.

We were looking at this to see if we could get more powerful wintel
hardware with the money we'd be spending on Sparc hardware, so skimping
wasn't a concern for us. And yes, I did an hour's worth of
self-flagellation for writing "windows hardware" instead of
intel/wintel. I hope we can all be friends again.

5. There is no five.

--Tom
_______________________________________________
sunmanagers mailing list
sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagers



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Wed Apr 09 2008 - 23:30:24 EDT