How to configure JNI FCI-1063 for E450+Brocade+Clariion CX600

marlon@idirect.com

--
Tim Kirby                                       651-605-9074
trk at cray.com                Cray Inc. Information Systems
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 08:10:13 +0400
From: Waheed Rahuman <waheed.rahuman@gmail.com>
Subject: Java Problem...
To: sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
Message-ID: <36ceb50705031820105fe607e@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Hi Greetings...to you...
I am trying  to install Sybase EAServer 5.2 its a java installation
executable.
When i run the setup i am getting the following error :
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: run
Anyone come across this kind of error ?
Please give me your advice..
Thanks in advance for your kind reply..
Regards
Waheed
--
K.Waheed Rahuman B.E, M.S (BITS)
Software Engineer,
P.O.Box 43329
Abudhabi
United Arab Emirates 43329
Mobile : +971505871748
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 11:04:02 +0000
From: "nipun sharma" <sharma_nipun@hotmail.com>
Subject: Regardind Solstice CMIP 9.0
To: sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
Message-ID: <BAY18-F1853ADF0FDBFD53BA390AF84B0@phx.gbl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hi All,
I have configured the Demo Solstice CMIP 9.0 on Sparc mahcine. I tried to
run the example program provided by the Solstice CMIP package with TCP/IP as
transport layer(RFC 1006 package) and it works fine.
With the help of cmiptool provided by Solstice CMIP Package, I am able to
modify the Various Selector values provided by the CMIP Stack i.e PSEL ,
SSEL , TSEL.
But there are some constraints/limitation for modification of TSEL and SSEL
parameters as mentioned in CMIPADMIN guide i.e
a) SSEL Cannot be more than 4 ASCII character
b) TSEL Cannot be configured as empty <null>.
But I have a requirement where I need to configure the TSEL as <null> and
SSEL as 6 ASCII Character ( or 12 digit hexadecimal ).
Moreover Whenever I try to modify the TSEL or SSEL i.e different from the
default value , the program does not work and fails in mp_bind() call.
The error message is :
Default value : TSEL = CMIP , SSEL = Prs
########################
Performing mp_bind()
 Communication-Error: Communication Problem.
handle_mp_error
########################
I am not sure whether its possible to modify the TSEL and SSEL parameter in
Solstice CMIP Package. If yes , then how can I solve this issue of modifying
the values i.e 6 ASCII character for SSEL and <null> for TSEL.
Regards
Nipun Sharma
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Screensavers for every mood! Jazz up your screen! Bring your PC to life!
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 13:01:45 +0200
From: "Mahmoud Negm" <Mahmoud.Negm@vodafone.com>
Subject: Healing a Corrupted Superblock
To: <sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org>
Message-ID:
<5EE237630030734CB178760533789B9C077EEB@OCTE2KA1.clickgsm.Misrfone.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Dear,
If the superblock is corrupted the file system still can be repaired using
alternate superblock which are formed while making new file system .
the first alternate superblock number is 32 and others superblock numbers
can be found using the following command :
newfs -N <RAW_Device>
for example to run fsck using first alternate superblock following command
is used
fsck -F File_System -o b=32 <Raw_Device>
Best Regards,
Negm
-----Original Message-----
From: sunmanagers-bounces@sunmanagers.org
[mailto:sunmanagers-bounces@sunmanagers.org]On Behalf Of richard kumar
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2005 2:29 PM
To: sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
Subject: Superblock error --scsi disk
Hi All,
       I guess my superblock is corrupted . can anyone know how to corect
this
# fsck -y
** /dev/rdsk/c0t1d0s0
** Currently Mounted on /
** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes
** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames
** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity
** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts
** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups
FILE SYSTEM STATE IN SUPERBLOCK IS WRONG; FIX?  yes
50317 files, 1131203 used, 357584 free (7192 frags, 43799 blocks,  0.4%
fragmentation)
FILE SYSTEM IS CURRENTLY MOUNTED.  CONTINUE?  yes
** /dev/rdsk/c0t1d0s7
** Currently Mounted on /export/home
** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes
** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames
** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity
** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts
** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups
81601 files, 12368018 used, 20612242 free (15354 frags, 2574611 blocks, 0.0%
fragmentation)
** /dev/rdsk/c0t1d0s2
BAD SUPER BLOCK: MAGIC NUMBER WRONG
USE AN ALTERNATE SUPER-BLOCK TO SUPPLY NEEDED INFORMATION; eg. fsck [-F ufs]
-o b=# [special ...] where # is the alternate super block. SEE fsck_ufs(1M).
#
Regards
A.Richard
***********************************************
The content of this document is classified as Vodafone Egypt S.A.E.
Confidential and Proprietary Information.
The recipient hereby is committed to hold in strict confidence the contents
of this (e-mail, document, information) and not to disclose to any third
party without the prior written consent of Vodafone Egypt S.A.E. Recipient
will be held liable for any unauthorized disclosure.
If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by
return e-mail and delete the message in its entirety, including any
attachments.
***********************************************
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 18:29:12 +0300
From: "chanchal" <chanchal@gsh-sa.com>
Subject: increased  TTL time on sun
To: <sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org>
Message-ID: <000b01c52d61$97eb3920$a90a0a0a@GSH.LOCAL>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Dear sir,
              We have a network of windows 2000 machines connected to a Sun
E420R server ,of late when I ping from any Windows machine it display more
TTL time than when pinging to windows machine.The sun server has a gigabit
Ethernet Card.  The output is displayed below. The sun server is  installed
with PCNETLINK to connect to the windows network.
Thanks in advance for your reply
Regards
Chanchal
Microsoft Windows 2000 [Version 5.00.2195]
(C) Copyright 1985-2000 Microsoft Corp.
Y:\>c:
C:\>ping 10.10.10.4
Pinging 10.10.10.3 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 10.10.10.4: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=255 Reply from 10.10.10.4:
bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=255 Reply from 10.10.10.4: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=255
Reply from 10.10.10.4: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=255
Ping statistics for 10.10.10.4:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round
trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 0ms, Maximum =  0ms, Average =  0ms
C:\>ping 10.10.10.2
Pinging 10.10.10.2 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 10.10.10.2: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=128 Reply from 10.10.10.2:
bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=128 Reply from 10.10.10.2: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=128
Reply from 10.10.10.2: bytes=32 time<10ms TTL=128
Ping statistics for 10.10.10.2:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round
trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 0ms, Maximum =  0ms, Average =  0ms
C:\>
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
sunmanagers mailing list
sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagers
End of sunmanagers Digest, Vol 24, Issue 38
*******************************************
_______________________________________________
sunmanagers mailing list
sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagers