From: Syed ullah (saullah@yahoo.com)
Date: Tue Dec 28 2004 - 23:43:35 EST
Guys,
Anyone have come across Application hung problems with Resonate load balancer (Primary schedular) running with Netscape Proxy on Solaris 2.9 (causes the primary schedular to hung situation during peak http traffic times).
The core dump shows rxp driver causing the CPU panic. We have already replaced Sun hardware like CPU and motherboard in an attempt to isolate the problem from just being Hardware. Any help or suggestion would be appreciated.
Regards,
Syed Atif
sunmanagers-request@sunmanagers.org wrote:
Send sunmanagers mailing list submissions to
sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagers
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
sunmanagers-request@sunmanagers.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
sunmanagers-owner@sunmanagers.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of sunmanagers digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. question , ufsdump warning! (GoijI P)
2. V20z: support adapter teaming ? (kristianto.setiawan@sun.co.id)
3. Veritas Volume Manager problem (ahmed ziati)
4. [SUMMARY] How to OS install on 0+1 raid volume ? (PSI)
5. Problem with GNU screen and multiple users on Solaris 9
(Storie, Sam [EPM/RTC])
6. Lowered speed of backup (ufsdump) (przemol)
7. Known issues when upgrading VxVM from 3.1.1, 3.1 and 3.2 to
3.5 ? (rob.de.langhe@belgacom.be)
8. [SUMMARY] Problem with GNU screen and multiple users on
Solaris 9 (Storie, Sam [EPM/RTC])
9. Problems Booting up V1280 (HRISHIKESH KULKARNI)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2004 21:50:28 -0500
From: "GoijI P"
Subject: question , ufsdump warning!
To: sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
sparc solaris 8. when script running ufsdump , i get :
DUMP: Warning - cannot read sector xyzf `/dev/xyz..'
then system crashes occurs or executes init 5.
what is the workaround to complete the backup?.
I was thinking of creating a mirror but for now like to know
if this can work.
_________________________________________________________________
FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar get it now!
http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2004 21:03:33 +0700
From: kristianto.setiawan@sun.co.id
Subject: V20z: support adapter teaming ?
To: sunmanagers
Message-ID: <3786ccdb3169.41cf2725@sun.co.id>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Merry X-Mas and Happy New Year to all of you....
I have Sun V20z and Windows2K installed,
Does the NIC port (2 port) of Sun V20z support for adapter teaming ?
If i'm not wrong the mother board of V20z come from newisys.
I know Windows support adapter teaming if using NIC Intel@PRO100/1000 --> Sun V65x
Rgds,
Kristianto
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2004 14:33:30 GMT
From: "ahmed ziati"
Subject: Veritas Volume Manager problem
To: sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
Message-ID: <1104071610021243@lycos-europe.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hi,
I have a big problem with Veritas Volume Manager under Sun Solaris 5.8 (SunOS xxxxx 5.8 Generic_108528-19 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Blade-1000) .
I have created a database file in the directory /dev/vx/rdsk/rootdg, no errors were returned during the creation process. But after many months, the server is rebooted, and we discover that this file has disappeared!!
Is it a normal behaviour that a file was deleted by the system ?? Is there a way to restore this file ??
Tnx
C est le moment de dynamiser votre bonte mail en dicouvrant les offres CaraMail Max et Pro - http://www.caramail.com
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 09:42:49 +0900
From: "PSI"
Subject: [SUMMARY] How to OS install on 0+1 raid volume ?
To: "Sun Managers"
Message-ID: <001601c4ebac$ffd7c6d0$9600fea9@PSInb>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Thanks Peter
The openboot prom simply does not allow root to be on a stripe.
OBP can only mirror root filesystem.
Thanks & Regards,
Sang-In, Park
----- Original Message -----
From: "PSI"
To: "Sun Managers"
Sent: Friday, December 24, 2004 11:45 AM
Subject: How to OS install on 0+1 raid volume ?
> Hi, Gurus.
>
> I will try to OS install on 0+1 raid volume using SVM.
> How to OS install on 0+1 raid volume ? I saw OS install on 1(mirror) raid volume using JumpStart at Doc.sun.com
>
> Let me know your any idea.. plz..
>
>
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> PSI
> _______________________________________________
> sunmanagers mailing list
> sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
> http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagers
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 11:56:03 -0600
From: "Storie, Sam [EPM/RTC]"
Subject: Problem with GNU screen and multiple users on Solaris 9
To: "'sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org'"
Message-ID:
<676039072D37D4118FC400508BCF9B390F91AE9E@mxsfrcocha01.na.emersonprocess.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
I am encountering an issue that I have been unable to resolve myself
concerning using the GNU 'screen' program on Solaris 9. This has been asked
on this list before, but I was unable to find a resolution in both the
archives, or via Google searches, so forgive me for trying again :) For
reference I downloaded the screen package from the sunfreeware.com website.
On a Solaris 9 system, the first user to invoke the screen program is able
to run the program without any issues or problems. However, when a different
user attempts to run it later they are presented with the following error:
shmat: Permission denied
>From some preliminary analysis [1] I've learned when screen is invoked it
uses shmget() and shmat() to allocate a chunk of shared memory with
permissions 0700. When subsequent screen sessions are opened by other users
they also try to access this same shared memory, but I suspect are denied
because of the permissions used when it was originally created. This
prevents anyone but the first user to invoke screen from using it. The root
user is always able to invoke screen, but if root is the first one to do so,
then no one else can use it.
Has anyone else encountered this situation and found a way to resolve it?
I've used screen for years on other systems and this is the first time I've
encountered a problem like this. Thanks in advance.
-Sam
[1] Here is the snippet from the truss output indicating what is causing
this error:
...
open("/proc/self/fd", O_RDONLY|O_NDELAY|O_LARGEFILE) = 3
fstat64(3, 0xFFBFDA50) = 0
fcntl(3, F_SETFD, 0x00000001) = 0
getdents64(3, 0x000742A8, 8192) = 176
getdents64(3, 0x000742A8, 8192) = 0
close(3) = 0
shmget(-1160968401, 18000, 0700|IPC_CREAT) = 1
shmat(1, 0, 0) Err#13 EACCES
ioctl(1, TCGETA, 0xFFBFD544) = 0
fstat64(1, 0xFFBFD460) = 0
shmat: Permission denied
write(1, " s h m a t : P e r m i".., 26) = 26
_exit(1)
--- Sam Storie Database Administrator Rosemount Incorporated Emerson Process Management (952)940-7021 ------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 14:35:23 +0100 From: przemol Subject: Lowered speed of backup (ufsdump) To: sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org Message-ID: <20041228133523.GA5293@host> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Sparc server + Solaris 9. There is daily backup at the server done using ufsdump. But for a few days I noticed that speed of the backup (reported by ufsdump itself) is lowered, that is at the end of its work ufsdump shows: DUMP: 95.82% done, finished in 0:18 DUMP: 97.42% done, finished in 0:11 DUMP: 99.57% done, finished in 0:01 DUMP: 118524734 blocks (57873.41MB) on 1 volume at 2182 KB/sec When I looked at log of each backup I noticed: DUMP: 115871358 blocks (56577.81MB) on 1 volume at 3659 KB/sec DUMP: 117732798 blocks (57486.72MB) on 1 volume at 3846 KB/sec DUMP: 119616190 blocks (58406.34MB) on 1 volume at 3593 KB/sec DUMP: 119345214 blocks (58274.03MB) on 1 volume at 3511 KB/sec DUMP: 120715710 blocks (58943.22MB) on 1 volume at 3717 KB/sec DUMP: 119813182 blocks (58502.53MB) on 1 volume at 3513 KB/sec DUMP: 117722302 blocks (57481.59MB) on 1 volume at 3530 KB/sec DUMP: 117993406 blocks (57613.97MB) on 1 volume at 3770 KB/sec DUMP: 119807230 blocks (58499.62MB) on 1 volume at 3836 KB/sec DUMP: 122314878 blocks (59724.06MB) on 1 volume at 3606 KB/sec DUMP: 122046270 blocks (59592.91MB) on 1 volume at 3579 KB/sec DUMP: 122824574 blocks (59972.94MB) on 1 volume at 2110 KB/sec <<<<<< !!! DUMP: 121487230 blocks (59319.94MB) on 1 volume at 2301 KB/sec DUMP: 118413054 blocks (57818.87MB) on 1 volume at 2078 KB/sec DUMP: 118743486 blocks (57980.22MB) on 1 volume at 2155 KB/sec DUMP: 120442174 blocks (58809.66MB) on 1 volume at 2224 KB/sec DUMP: 123470142 blocks (60288.16MB) on 1 volume at 2127 KB/sec DUMP: 125308350 blocks (61185.72MB) on 1 volume at 2103 KB/sec DUMP: 123020222 blocks (60068.47MB) on 1 volume at 2112 KB/sec DUMP: 120073982 blocks (58629.87MB) on 1 volume at 2040 KB/sec DUMP: 116689406 blocks (56977.25MB) on 1 volume at 2156 KB/sec DUMP: 118524734 blocks (57873.41MB) on 1 volume at 2182 KB/sec Can someone explain me why it could slow down so much ? How can I diagnose it ? How can I find what caused the problem ? przemol ------------------------------ Message: 7 Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 15:23:43 +0100 From: Subject: Known issues when upgrading VxVM from 3.1.1, 3.1 and 3.2 to 3.5 ? To: Message-ID: <93613272B187D211B5DB0008C75DE4E21A7E0E0E@ex001.bc> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Hi, we have a mix of VxVM versions here (3.1.1, 3.1, 3.2 and 3.5) on a mix of Solaris versions (2.6, 8 and 9) and want to bring them all to the same level, i.e. 3.5 Is there anyone who experienced nasty problems while upgrading to 3.5 ? TIA Rob **** DISCLAIMER **** "This e-mail and any attachments thereto may contain information which is confidential and/or protected by intellectual property rights and are intended for the sole use of the recipient(s)named above. Any use of the information contained herein (including, but not limited to, total or partial reproduction, communication or distribution in any form) by persons other than the designated recipient(s) is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender either by telephone or by e-mail and delete the material from any computer. Thank you for your cooperation." ------------------------------ Message: 8 Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 16:22:29 -0600 From: "Storie, Sam [EPM/RTC]" Subject: [SUMMARY] Problem with GNU screen and multiple users on Solaris 9 To: "'sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org'" Message-ID: <676039072D37D4118FC400508BCF9B390F91AEA5@mxsfrcocha01.na.emersonprocess.com> Content-Type: text/plain Thanks to Neil D Quiogue and Luc I. Suryo for their responses which led to one solution to this problem. Setting the screen binary to be suid root (chmod u+s) will prevent this problem from occurring. I'm not totally comfortable with the security implications of doing so, but I've now found other postings of people using a suid screen to overcome other problems. For example, many Linux admins seem okay with setting screen suid root to allow utmp updates to work properly. I trust our user base, but suid root programs just make me a bit nervous. I'd still appreciate hearing from other Solaris admins about this, but it seemed like a good idea to post this solution. -Sam --- Sam Storie Database Administrator Rosemount Incorporated Emerson Process Management ------------------------------ Message: 9 Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 16:23:41 -0800 (PST) From: HRISHIKESH KULKARNI --------------------------------- Subject: Problems Booting up V1280 To: sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org Message-ID: <20041229002341.41264.qmail@web53706.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi all, We have a SUNFIRE V1280 server which had its IB_SSC board replaced. After replacing the board and trying to boot up, we get the following messages. Hardware Reset... Test @(#) SYSTEM CONTROLLER(SC) POST 23 2002/03/22 18:03 Test Local I2C LM75 Test PSR = 0x044010e5 TEMP2(CB PCR = 0x04004000 Test SelfTest running at DiagLevel:0x20 Temparature : 28.0 Degree(C) CSR SC Boot PROM Testal I2C PCF8574 Test BootPROM CheckSum Testice Test CBH Register Ac IU Test Tes Console IU instruction set Testple CBH Register Access SRMMU TLB Read miss Test08timeout waiting for WRDY, status=0x6027800 SRMMU page probe TestRDY, status=0x60278008ress not available. SRMMU segment probe Testess not available. MAC address SRMMU region probe Testching in MAC address is 0:0:0:0:0:0 SRMMU context probe Testone Microsystems, Inc. All right IIep Internal Cache Testrosystems, Inc. All rights DCACHE RAM access Test license terms. DCACHE TAG access Te RTOS versio PCI Master Abort TestFailure, ID0 not installed PCIC Init Test PANIC: Fatal Software Error Memory Test java.la Memory Address Test at sun.serengeti.PlaceHelpe RIO Ebus Test Source) Rio Ebus Probe Test at sun.serengeti.util.Panic. RIO Ethernet Test Source) Rio Enet Probe Test at sun.serengeti.util.Panic Rio Ethernet Int Loopbacks Test at su DUART(16552) InterSC TestSource) Loopback Testlang.Thread.run(Unknown Source) COM3 port COM4 port:16 noname lom: P Interrupt Test Mon Dec COM3 port Intr #2Fatal CLK(Self) :0x0000ffff CLK(Other) : 0x00000000 IU Test IU REF : 0x0000221fest CLOCK(SELF) FREQ : 75.2 MHZn access Test CLOCK(OTHER) FREQ : 0.0 MHZ Test FPU SBBC PCI Controller Testst SBBC PCI Config Space probe Test SRMMU TLB SBBC Internal Reg Access Test SRMMU TLB SBBC Interrupts Test SBBC Device2 Test Test BId&MFG Reg (SBBC Dev2) Test Read hit Test SBBC Device3 Test DCACHE Write miss FRU Prsnt Reg (SBBC Dev3) Test DCACHE Write hit SBBC Device5 Test EPLD (SBBC Dev5) TOD Interrupts Test PCIC Probe I2C Register Access Test Enable Mux Register Test Channel Mux Register Test Add Command Register Test Data Register TestAddress Test Local I2C AT24C64 Test RIO Ebus Test EEPROM Device Test Test performing eeprom Test channel[00000001] Voltage(0x0000009A) :1.50erSC Test channel[00000002] Voltage(0x0000009E) :3.39 COM3 port channel[00000003] Voltage(0x00000099) :4.98 Interrupt Test channel[00000004] Voltage(0x00000000) :0.0 Intr #2 Local I2C LM75 Test2 TEMP0(IIep) Device Test System Clock verify Temparature : 18.50 Degree(C) Board0 Clock i Local I2C LM75 Test 75M TEMP1(Rio) Device Test Temparature : 17.50 Degree(C)ffff CLK(Other) : 0x00000 Local I2C LM75 Sc CSR Device Test SBBC PCI Config Space probe Console Bus Hub Test CBH Register Access Test POST Complete.upts ERI Device Present Getting MAC address for SSC1rt1 interrupt generation Tes busyWait() timeout waiting for RRDY, status=0x6027c008 Port0 interrupt generation Tests INT busyWait() timeout waiting for RRDY, status=0x6027c008 SBBC Device0 Test busyWait() timeout waiting for RRDY, status=0x6027c008 SBBC Device1 busyWait() timeout waiting for WRDY, status=0x60278008RAM (SBBC Dev1) Sun 1280 System Firmware Test RTOS version: 23 TOD(M48 ScApp version: 5.13.0012 LW8_build0.12 TOD Init SC POST diag level: min The date is Monday, December 27, 2004, 5:16:50 AM PST. Test PANIC: No ID information. java.lang.Exception at sun.serengeti.util.Panic.log(Unknown Source) at sun.serengeti.ScApp.run(Unknown Source) at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source) PANIC: Fatal Software Error java.lang.NullPointerException at sun.serengeti.PlaceHelper.findPlace(Unknown Source) Mon Dec 27 05:16:56 noname lom: PANIC: No ID information. at sun.serengeti.util.Panic.finishPanic(Unknown Source) at sun.serengeti.util.Panic.log(Unknown Source) at sun.serengeti.ScApp.run(Unknown Source) at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source) Mon Dec 27 05:16:56 noname lom: PANIC: Fatal Software Error AT this points it does hardware eset adn above messages repeat. This cycle goes on. What could be the issue. I assume that board is seated correctly sinceit does boot up. Regards, Hrishi. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Meet the all-new My Yahoo! - Try it today! http://my.yahoo.com ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ sunmanagers mailing list sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagers End of sunmanagers Digest, Vol 21, Issue 32 ******************************************* Syed Atif SibghatUllah saullah@yahoo.com saullah@hotmail.com 281-484-6017 (home) 832-606-6264 (cell) All your favorites on one personal page Try My Yahoo! _______________________________________________ sunmanagers mailing list sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagers
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Wed Apr 09 2008 - 23:29:56 EDT