bat trap: type=34

From: Gerard Henry (ghenry@cmi.univ-mrs.fr)
Date: Tue Dec 30 2003 - 03:25:01 EST

• Next message: Drew Skinner: "fssnap versus Instant Image"
• Previous message: Al-Shabib, Mohammed: "Windows 2000 DNS update"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

hello,
our server, E250 sol8, with latest recommended patches cluster applied last day did a kernel panic
Dec 30 06:51:33 scr ^Mpanic[cpu0]/thread=3000858bc80:
Dec 30 06:51:33 scr unix: [ID 799565 kern.notice] BAD TRAP: type=34 rp=2a100590f
d0 addr=fffffeefdeadbf0f mmu_fsr=0
Dec 30 06:51:33 scr unix: [ID 100000 kern.notice]
Dec 30 06:51:33 scr unix: [ID 839527 kern.notice] atalkd:
Dec 30 06:51:33 scr unix: [ID 123557 kern.notice] alignment error:

i suspect netatalk, but this works fine until we applied new patches.
But since september, this machine did also a "bad trap: type=30" and "bad trap: type=31",

SunOS scr 5.8 Generic_108528-27 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-250

anybody using netatalk? version?

thanks in advance, i'll resume

gerard henry
_______________________________________________
sunmanagers mailing list
sunmanagers@sunmanagers.org
http://www.sunmanagers.org/mailman/listinfo/sunmanagers

• Next message: Drew Skinner: "fssnap versus Instant Image"
• Previous message: Al-Shabib, Mohammed: "Windows 2000 DNS update"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Wed Apr 09 2008 - 23:27:45 EDT