Re: to dsniff or not to dsniff

From: Martin Mačok (martin.macok@underground.cz)
Date: Thu Jun 01 2006 - 10:06:48 EDT


On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 10:40:59AM -0400, killy wrote:

> As Gary stated you could hardcode the MAC to each port on the switch
> or simply limit the number of MACs on any given port.

This does not protect against ARP poisoning which is one of the most
effective attack method against switched networks.

> Or, hehe static arp tables on every pc. ;-) just kidding. lol.

This one would protect against it ;-)

Anyway, the attack is easy to spot with arpwatch daemon for example.

Martin Mačok
ICT Security Consultant

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This List Sponsored by: Cenzic

Concerned about Web Application Security?
Why not go with the #1 solution - Cenzic, the only one to win the Analyst's
Choice Award from eWeek. As attacks through web applications continue to rise,
you need to proactively protect your applications from hackers. Cenzic has the
most comprehensive solutions to meet your application security penetration
testing and vulnerability management needs. You have an option to go with a
managed service (Cenzic ClickToSecure) or an enterprise software
(Cenzic Hailstorm). Download FREE whitepaper on how a managed service can
help you: http://www.cenzic.com/news_events/wpappsec.php
And, now for a limited time we can do a FREE audit for you to confirm your
results from other product. Contact us at request@cenzic.com for details.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Sat Apr 12 2008 - 10:56:01 EDT