From: Peter Kosinar (goober@ksp.sk)
Date: Fri May 12 2006 - 14:45:27 EDT
Hello,
> I was wondering how an attacker can bypass a chrooted environement. A
> (common) technique consist in finding a vulnerable program (in the
> chrooted environnement) and injecting it a shellcode (i.e
> ../../../../../../../bin/bash for ex.) by BoF. But normally, in the
> chrooted environement, you volontarily add only necessary tools (like
> ls, cat, less...), and vulnerable softwares are uncommon...
Well, without a vulnerable program, there is nothing to attack and thus no
chroot environment to bypass :-) However, I'd guess you're considering the
following scenario:
There is a vulnerable application running in chrooted environment, the
directory it is chrooted in doesn't actually need to contain any files.
The attacker manages to exploit a vulnerability in the program, i.e. (s)he
is able to make it run whatever code (s)he wants. The real objective is,
however, to be able to access to the files on the system. This is called
"breaking out of the chroot".
One of the well-known techniques is the ../../../.., which is based on one
(bad) property of chroot -- the chroot(2) system call does not change the
current working directory.
Consider the following sequence of steps achieves:
1) mkdir("goo")
2) chroot("goo")
3) chdir("../../../../../..")
4) chroot(".")
Steps 1 and 2 create a directory called "goo" and set the root directory
of current process to that dir. However, the current WORKING directory is
not changed -- it is OUTSIDE the root directory of the process. Step 3
then moves upwards in the hierarchy (the original chrooted directory tree
might have been several directories deep in the tree), trying to reach the
"true" root directory. The last step sets the new root to the current
working directory (= true root), thus accomplishing the
"break-out-of-chroot" mission.
That's why some security patches enforce chdir("/") immediately after
chroot() call. Note that this is not the only method of breaking out of
the chroot jail, it's just one of the more widely used ones.
Peter
-- [Name] Peter Kosinar [Quote] 2B | ~2B = exp(i*PI) [ICQ] 134813278 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This List Sponsored by: Cenzic Concerned about Web Application Security? Why not go with the #1 solution - Cenzic, the only one to win the Analyst's Choice Award from eWeek. As attacks through web applications continue to rise, you need to proactively protect your applications from hackers. Cenzic has the most comprehensive solutions to meet your application security penetration testing and vulnerability management needs. You have an option to go with a managed service (Cenzic ClickToSecure) or an enterprise software (Cenzic Hailstorm). Download FREE whitepaper on how a managed service can help you: http://www.cenzic.com/news_events/wpappsec.php And, now for a limited time we can do a FREE audit for you to confirm your results from other product. Contact us at request@cenzic.com for details. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Sat Apr 12 2008 - 10:55:57 EDT