From: Art Cooper (acooper@pop.innerwall.com)
Date: Thu May 11 2006 - 17:46:31 EDT
Because I BELIEVE there is a "LOT" more here than meets the eye.. I wonder
if he took the evidence to the Univ. and they ignore him.. If so, then
perhaps he had an axe to grind.. My point is this - what ACTUAL DAMAGE was
caused? Most lawyers will tell you that you MUST prove there was malice and
ACTUAL DAMAGE.
I agree he acted stupid, but I'm just afraid it may start a precedent. I
also agree he should have had permission, but I just can't help but have
a "gut-feeling" there's more here than meets the eye.. I have only been in
IT for 28 years, but I'm still learning..
Coop
On Thu, 11 May 2006 17:41:21 -0400, lee.e.rian wrote
> "Art Cooper" <acooper@pop.innerwall.com> wrote on 05/11/2006
> 11:25:57 AM:
>
> > I agree Bill. The fact they use information HE provided to then convict
> him
> > is completely ridiculous..
>
> If he actually did provide the information to USC that would be one thing.
> But he breaks in, steals personal records, doesn't notify USC about the
> security problem, and sends the personal records to a reporter!??
>
> from
> http://www.wired.com/news/columns/circuitcourt/0,70857-0.html?tw=wn_index_6
>
> "McCarty is a professional computer security consultant who
> noticed that there was a problem with the way the University of
> Southern California had constructed its web page for online
> applications. A database programming error allowed outsiders to
> obtain applicants' personal information, including Social Security
> numbers.
>
> For proof, the man copied seven applicants' personal records and
> anonymously sent them to a reporter for SecurityFocus. The journalist
> notified the school, the school fixed the problem, and the
> reporter wrote an article about it."
>
> Why would anyone try to defend this behavior much less get upset
> when he's prosecuted?
>
> Lee
>
> > On Wed, 10 May 2006 09:20:22 -0500, William Hancock wrote
> > > Hey there pen-testers, take this with a grain of salt, it just got me
> > > excited. I am really interested in everyones opinion on the matter
> > > or corporate responsibility and ownership.
> > >
> > > <RANT>
> > > In an article posted to slashdot today
> > >
> > > (http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/05/10/112259&from=rss) a
> > > man has been convicted of hacking when he casually and helpfully
> > > reported a security vulnerability to the owners of a web site, in
> > > this case The University of Southern California. It reads like it
> > > was some sort of simple SQL injection and upon gleaning the
> > > information he reported it.
> <.. snip ..>
Best Regards,
Coop
Arthur B. Cooper Jr. "Coop"
Senior Network Engineer
Innerwall, Inc.
http://www.innerwall.com
US Mobile: 719-640-7223
acooper@innerwall.com
"Most men lead lives of quiet desperation
and go to the grave with the song still in them."
* Henry David Thoreau *
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This List Sponsored by: Cenzic
Concerned about Web Application Security?
Why not go with the #1 solution - Cenzic, the only one to win the Analyst's
Choice Award from eWeek. As attacks through web applications continue to rise,
you need to proactively protect your applications from hackers. Cenzic has the
most comprehensive solutions to meet your application security penetration
testing and vulnerability management needs. You have an option to go with a
managed service (Cenzic ClickToSecure) or an enterprise software
(Cenzic Hailstorm). Download FREE whitepaper on how a managed service can
help you: http://www.cenzic.com/news_events/wpappsec.php
And, now for a limited time we can do a FREE audit for you to confirm your
results from other product. Contact us at request@cenzic.com for details.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Sat Apr 12 2008 - 10:55:56 EDT