RE: Core Impact vs. Canvas vs. Metasploit

From: Peter Wood (peterw@firstbase.co.uk)
Date: Sat Apr 29 2006 - 11:42:29 EDT


We use Core Impact too. We pay $2500 a year plus $495 an engagement IIRC.

regards
Pete

At 08:51 28/04/2006 -0700, Damien Dinh wrote:
>I have Core Impact and it's gui is very easy to use; along with A-Z
>automation (scan, exploit, and load mini shell agent), you can also just
>drag any exploit onto a target and whamo! It doesn't even break the
>service you're exploiting; at this point, you can drag and drop an
>agent; then you can automatically uninstall the agent as well. Great
>tool but just very $$$$$$.
>
>Regards,
>Damien Dinh

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Wood FBCS CITP MIEEE MIMIS CISSP
Chief of Operations
First Base Technologies
Office: +44 (0)1273 454525
Mobile: +44 (0)7774 239915
www.fbtechies.co.uk
www.white-hats.co.uk

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This List Sponsored by: Cenzic

Concerned about Web Application Security?
Why not go with the #1 solution - Cenzic, the only one to win the Analyst's
Choice Award from eWeek. As attacks through web applications continue to rise,
you need to proactively protect your applications from hackers. Cenzic has the
most comprehensive solutions to meet your application security penetration
testing and vulnerability management needs. You have an option to go with a
managed service (Cenzic ClickToSecure) or an enterprise software
(Cenzic Hailstorm). Download FREE whitepaper on how a managed service can
help you: http://www.cenzic.com/news_events/wpappsec.php
And, now for a limited time we can do a FREE audit for you to confirm your
results from other product. Contact us at request@cenzic.com for details.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Sat Apr 12 2008 - 10:55:53 EDT