From: Ivan C (ivanhec@gmail.com)
Date: Thu Jul 28 2005 - 00:12:20 EDT
Greg,
Check out this article
Network Intrusion Prevention Systems – When They're Valuable, andWhen They're Nothttp://www.linuxsecurity.com/content/view/119888/49/
cheersIvan
On 7/28/05, Gregory D. McPhee <greg@mcpheecomm.com> wrote:> > TippingPoint is signature based, catches want is known to be bad.> > Top Layer is Firewall based, blocks transactions at L3, L4 and L7.> > Intrushield (Mcafee) is a combination of both. Top Layer has great> clustering and performance, Mcafee and TippingPoint have good> centralized management capabilities.> > Greg...> > -----Original Message-----> From: Charbel Chalala Issa [mailto:charbel@cultura.com.br]> Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 8:10 AM> To: bw; pen-test@securityfocus.com> Subject: RES: IPS comparison> > hi,> > look at> http://www.mcafeesecurity.com/us/products/mcafee/network_ips/intrushield> _app> liances.htm> > intrushield appliances...> > regards> > > > > > -----Mensagem original-----> De: bw [mailto:bjshhsjb@yahoo.com]> Enviada em: Monday, July 25, 2005 12:52 PM> Para: pen-test@securityfocus.com> Assunto: IPS comparison> > > I have been tasked with comparing IPS appliances. I am> seriously looking at top layer's product line and> tipping
point. Does anyone have a spreadsheet or know> of any tool they would be willing to share for> comparing products. Im new to this so any help would> be appreciated> > thank you> > __________________________________________________> Do You Yahoo!?> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around> http://mail.yahoo.com> > > >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Sat Apr 12 2008 - 10:54:39 EDT