From: Guillaume Vissian (somebodyishere@gmail.com)
Date: Fri Jul 01 2005 - 05:41:45 EDT
Be carefull the history logs only show the common commands input on
the shell, this didn't show everything wrappen on it. Only keyloggers
can do that. If history remember all it would be a major security
failure... For example with shells history logs you can't see the vim
editing sequences, and for sure the password entries. And the real,
and only for me, utility of a keylogger is to log thoses pass entries.
A good keylogger have to, in my mind, be directly implanted in the
kernel, the shells let to much ways to escape from the logs...
A way to search :
http://linux.ittoolbox.com/documents/document.asp?i=2284
Google is your friend
G.
2005/7/1, Joshua Hamor <josh@cnemedia.com>:
> Agreed. Most modern shells have history logs. You should be able to save
> this text file for your tests.
>
> -J also
>
> Jeff Miller wrote:
> > I've used bash shell logging before for similar situations. just grab
> > the source and compile with the syslogging option.
> >
> >
> > On Jun 30, 2005, at 2:36 PM, JB wrote:
> >
> >> I'm wondering if anyone has either a kernel level keystroke logger
> >> for the
> >> Linux 2.6, or a userspace keystroke logger for Linux. As part of our
> >> penetration testing, we are required to give the client a log of all
> >> actions performed - so this would be a good way of logging all linux
> >> commands. Also - if you know of the same sort of tool for windows - that
> >> would also be appreciated.
> >>
> >> -J
> >>
> >>
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Sat Apr 12 2008 - 10:54:30 EDT