Re: 'in-line' pentest and pentest linux distro?

From: psiphon@infosecguides.com
Date: Tue Apr 12 2005 - 17:46:52 EDT


('binary' encoding is not supported, stored as-is) In-Reply-To: <20050412111859.O89525-100000@xs2.xs4all.nl>

Not sure about the answers to your other questions, but as far as a pentest linux distro, check out

http://www.whoppix.net

They have some video demos that show some of the tools in action as well. A pentesters dream version of Knoppix.

Psiphon

>Received: (qmail 22569 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2005 13:36:08 -0000
>Received: from outgoing.securityfocus.com (HELO outgoing3.securityfocus.com) (205.206.231.27)
> by mail.securityfocus.com with SMTP; 12 Apr 2005 13:36:08 -0000
>Received: from lists.securityfocus.com (lists.securityfocus.com [205.206.231.19])
> by outgoing3.securityfocus.com (Postfix) with QMQP
> id 9D0FB237025; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 07:44:49 -0600 (MDT)
>Mailing-List: contact pen-test-help@securityfocus.com; run by ezmlm
>Precedence: bulk
>List-Id: <pen-test.list-id.securityfocus.com>
>List-Post: <mailto:pen-test@securityfocus.com>
>List-Help: <mailto:pen-test-help@securityfocus.com>
>List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:pen-test-unsubscribe@securityfocus.com>
>List-Subscribe: <mailto:pen-test-subscribe@securityfocus.com>
>Delivered-To: mailing list pen-test@securityfocus.com
>Delivered-To: moderator for pen-test@securityfocus.com
>Received: (qmail 24806 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2005 09:56:41 -0000
>Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 11:33:13 +0200 (CEST)
>From: Rob J Meijer <rmeijer@xs4all.nl>
>To: pen-test@securityfocus.com
>Subject: 'in-line' pentest and pentest linux distro?
>Message-ID: <20050412111859.O89525-100000@xs2.xs4all.nl>
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
>X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner
>
>When looking at enviroments with MAC locking and ID in place, and pentest
>possibilities from workstation locations, I've been trying to find some
>info on the 'in-line' way of working for such tests.
>
>It apears that I'm either the only one ever to have had the need for
>inline pentests, in order to test at workstation network connections that
>have MAC locking and ID in place, or that I just am using the wrong name
>for the concept.
>
>I'm interesting to know:
>
>1) Is nobody running into MAC lock and MAC ID enviroments where the
> workstation network connections are relevant?
>2) If anyone is, what are you using to do these tests, and would this
> be suitable for 'in-line' usage?
>3) Is anyone seriously working on a pentest linux distro?
>4) Do you think building and combining this functionality ino a
> specialized small linux distribution for something like the sigarete-box
> sized XXS1500, or something like it would be desirable for such functionality.
>
>I currently am occupied with an other big open source project, so I am
>hoping someone else has or will do some work on both the testing
>of MAC locked or MAC ID enabled enviroments and the creation of a pentest
>linux distro.
>I think I could fit in some porting to small devices from a basic PC Linux
>based distribution to such a device, if however I completely would have to
>role a new distribution from scratch, building lots of the tools myself,
>I would not be able to fit this in this year (unless someone needs it
>enough to actualy pay me for working on it, while keeping it open source).
>
>I think building a pentest inline device linux distro would be practical
>and usefull, but maybe its just my gadget madnes playing tricks on me ;-)
>Let me know what you think.
>
>
>Rob
>
>
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Sat Apr 12 2008 - 10:54:19 EDT