RE: Penetration Testing a CheckPoint NG FW on Nokia

From: Sharma, Pankaj (psharma@panynj.gov)
Date: Thu Jan 06 2005 - 13:36:32 EST


18262 /tcp CP_Exnet_PK Check Point Extrnet public key advertisement
- Protocol for exchange of public keys when configuring Extranet
no more supported since NG AI R55
18263 /tcp CP_Exnet_resolve Check Point Extranet remote objects resolution
- Protocol for importing exported objects from partner in Extranet
no more supported since NG AI R55
18264 /tcp FW1_ica_services Check Point Internal CA Fetch CRL and User Registration Services
- Protocol for Certificate Revocation Lists and registering users when using the Policy Server
- needed when e.g. FWM is starting

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Kurczaba [mailto:seclists@securinews.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 12:02 PM
To: cisspstudy@yahoo.com; pen-test@securityfocus.com
Subject: RE: Penetration Testing a CheckPoint NG FW on Nokia

I know that 264/tcp is used by securemote to get the site information, and that 500/udp is for IPSec. Does anybody know what 18262/tcp and 18264/tcp is used for? It seems questionable...

-Paul
-----Original Message-----
    From: "Jason binger"<cisspstudy@yahoo.com>
    Sent: 1/5/05 5:34:39 PM
    To: "pen-test@securityfocus.com"<pen-test@securityfocus.com>
    Subject: Penetration Testing a CheckPoint NG FW on Nokia
      I was recently performing a penetration test against a
    CheckPoint FW running on Nokia and received the
    following results from a port scan against the host:
    
    Interesting ports on XYZ:
    (The 65531 ports scanned but not shown below are in
    state: filtered)
    PORT STATE SERVICE VERSION
    264/tcp open fw1-secureremote Checkpoint Firewall1
    SecureRemote
    500/tcp closed isakmp
    18262/tcp closed unknown
    18264/tcp open unknown
    
    When telnetting to TCP 18264 I received:
    
    HTTP/1.0 400 Bad Request
    Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2005 21:57:57 GMT
    Server: Check Point SVN foundation
    Content-Type: text/html
    Connection: close
    Content-Length: 200
    
    Opening a browser to TCP 18264 gave an "Internal
    Server Error".
    
    Are there any tools that allow me to brute-force a
    username and password through the SecuRemote port to
    gain unauthorised access via VPN?
    
    I found this link for bruteforcing usernames on
    CheckPoint -
    http://www.securiteam.com/securitynews/5TP040U8AW.html
    but could not find the supporting tools. Does anyone
    have this set of tools? and other password
    bruteforcing tools?
    
    Are there any security implications of allowing access
    to TCP 18262 and TCP 18264 ports? What will break if
    these ports are closed?
    
    Does anyone have a list of other tests that should be
    performed against a CheckPoint FW?
    
    Cheers,
    
    
    
    
                    
    __________________________________
    Do you Yahoo!?
    All your favorites on one personal page - Try My Yahoo!
    http://my.yahoo.com
    



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Sat Apr 12 2008 - 10:54:12 EDT