Re: XPSP2 compatability

From: Max (reply.to.newsgroup@mozilla.org)
Date: Mon Aug 23 2004 - 07:33:56 EDT


Well said. I agree completely.

-- 
M@x
Jophn Deo wrote:
 > Sp2 hasn't been faling from the sky on a average rainy day.
 > An abundance of reading material was avaible to the developer community
 > maintaining their apps for the ms platform, in this case xp.
 > A lot off software,packages , ports or whatever such as ethereal
 > how good and impressive they might be , are still maintained by
 > by volunteers who besides their regular jobs ( perhaps at MS who knows)
 > , maintain and update the above described. Nothing wrong with that.
 > However very often i see some maintainer making apologies on the website
 > stating , haven't got the time, so this , that, isn't fixed,
 > I have installed and tested more than 30 linux kernels  upto FreeBSD
 > and OpenBSD unixes.All had their pro's and cons.A pc with linux
 > installed on it isn't more secure than a raw xp box with sp2 on it.
 > In my opinion security strongly depends on the skills and willingness of
 > the end-user and the goal he/she has in mind.It allso depends on wether
 > you only surf the net and send an occasional e-mail to some friends
 > or you want to explore p2p , play online games, participate in forums,
 > rip some shoutcast stations , make your own dolby 5.1/7.1 dvd's (taking
 > some risk by using some obscure programs) and so on.
 >
 > People who have sniffed around in the kitchen of the open source
 > community , know that its hard to implement for eg noexec memory pages ,
 > etc while still maintaining continuity and giving the end-user the
 > opportunity of using gui's isn't very trivial.It's to ordinaire giving
 > MS the blame alone, compatibillity  has some benefits from alertness of
 > its maintainers allso.As a (private) desktop MS has besides Mac OsX no
 > real compettitors.The true power of linux, *BSD ,Open/Bought Source is
 > the total cost of ownership.No expensive licence fees alone that exeed
 > the cost of all hardware.OpenBSD can become a superb firewall on a i386
 > box , when installed and maintained by some skilled hands , and compete
 > with far more expensive hardware solutions.Adamantix a debian based
 > ultra secure linux , can make your server a tough nutt to crack.
 > Yet don't wine if you can't mux your wav's into ac3's on it.
 >
 > I fully agree with some of the posters who said it all depends on the
 > purpose.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ethical Hacking at the InfoSec Institute. All of our class sizes are
guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction
with one of our expert instructors. Check out our Advanced Hacking course,
learn to write exploits and attack security infrastructure. Attend a course
taught by an expert instructor with years of in-the-field pen testing
experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Master the skills of an
Ethical Hacker to better assess the security of your organization.
http://www.securityfocus.com/sponsor/InfoSecInstitute_pen-test_040817
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Sat Apr 12 2008 - 10:54:00 EDT