Re: Re: GCIA, GSEC, GCIH, CISSP, CEH ???
- Next message: Aaron Peterson: "Re: [pen-test] WPA-PSK audit"
- Previous message: Danux: "Re: GCIA, GSEC, GCIH, CISSP, CEH ???"
- Maybe in reply to: Jim Clausing: "Re: GCIA, GSEC, GCIH, CISSP, CEH ???"
- Next in thread: Erin Carroll: "RE: Re: GCIA, GSEC, GCIH, CISSP, CEH ???"
- Reply: Erin Carroll: "RE: Re: GCIA, GSEC, GCIH, CISSP, CEH ???"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
('binary' encoding is not supported, stored as-is)
Hi,
My vote goes with SANS/GIAC. Take the GSE GIAC Platinum level tests and then you really are being tested.
Having 20 something GIAC certs and most of the major other ones, I think I am rather unique in being able to compare these from experiance.
In this, my money goes to the SANS GIAC ones.
Regards,
Dr Craig S Wright (GSE-Compliance)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is sponsored by: Cenzic
Need to secure your web apps NOW?
Cenzic finds more, "real" vulnerabilities fast.
Click to try it, buy it or download a solution FREE today!
http://www.cenzic.com/downloads
------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Next message: Aaron Peterson: "Re: [pen-test] WPA-PSK audit"
- Previous message: Danux: "Re: GCIA, GSEC, GCIH, CISSP, CEH ???"
- Maybe in reply to: Jim Clausing: "Re: GCIA, GSEC, GCIH, CISSP, CEH ???"
- Next in thread: Erin Carroll: "RE: Re: GCIA, GSEC, GCIH, CISSP, CEH ???"
- Reply: Erin Carroll: "RE: Re: GCIA, GSEC, GCIH, CISSP, CEH ???"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7
: Sat Apr 12 2008 - 10:58:17 EDT