From: Atrysk News (news@atrysk.com)
Date: Fri Sep 07 2007 - 21:08:34 EDT
You might also check out the following (not necessarily fuzzers, but
absolutely in the ws space...)
- wspawn
- wsknight
- wsrook
- wsaudit
T
On Sep 7, 2007, at 5:21 AM, Jan Münther wrote:
> fuzzing capability yet. Any suggestions?
>
>
Mmhm, seen WSBang?
http://www.isecpartners.com/wsbang.html
Python's WSDL parsing / proxy class generation is somewhat b0rked, which
is one of the reasons I've started writing a webservice fuzzer in C#
which instantiates the proxy classes and uses reflection to find out
which arguments there are and how to fuzz them. It basically works, but
it's so cruddy and idiosyncratic I don't think it'll ever see anyone
else's harddisk. Just a suggestion on a concept in case you think of
rolling your own.
Cheers,
j.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is sponsored by: Cenzic
Need to secure your web apps NOW?
Cenzic finds more, "real" vulnerabilities fast.
Click to try it, buy it or download a solution FREE today!
http://www.cenzic.com/downloads
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is sponsored by: Cenzic
Need to secure your web apps NOW?
Cenzic finds more, "real" vulnerabilities fast.
Click to try it, buy it or download a solution FREE today!
http://www.cenzic.com/downloads
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Sat Apr 12 2008 - 10:58:06 EDT