Re: Re: Mpack

From: jason_jones98@hotmail.com
Date: Thu Jun 28 2007 - 11:04:08 EDT

Next message: Ron Johnson - Adhost: "Scanning for SQL Injection"
Previous message: eladexposed@gmail.com: "Hardware/software secureIDs - pros and cons."
Maybe in reply to: Nikolaj: "Re: Mpack"
Next in thread: Kish Pent: "Re: Mpack"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

('binary' encoding is not supported, stored as-is) You should not apologise, you have done nothing wrong. If a pen-tester is only interested in gathering "potential" vulnerabilities with automated tools, then they should consider themselves "not" a pen-tester. Malicious code and the use of malicious code is a "must" for a pen-tester. some advice with using customizable exploit tools: "know what the outcome is" - if you are not 100% then do not use.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
This List Sponsored by: Cenzic

Swap Out your SPI or Watchfire app sec solution for
Cenzic's robust, accurate risk assessment and management
solution FREE - limited Time Offer

http://www.cenzic.com/wf-spi
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Next message: Ron Johnson - Adhost: "Scanning for SQL Injection"
Previous message: eladexposed@gmail.com: "Hardware/software secureIDs - pros and cons."
Maybe in reply to: Nikolaj: "Re: Mpack"
Next in thread: Kish Pent: "Re: Mpack"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Sat Apr 12 2008 - 10:57:55 EDT