Re: Strange ports

From: killy (killfactory@gmail.com)
Date: Sat Jun 23 2007 - 22:49:16 EDT


Thanks for all of the great responses.

I guess it may help to clear up a few things.

53 is valid and documented.
3389 is not documented, but I already know the answer before I ask why
they did this ;-)

But 1029 and 1032, were the interesting ones ot me.

Not documented or common to myself.

On 6/18/07, killy <killfactory@gmail.com> wrote:
> Scanning my external firewall(at work), I (yes, it is my job to) find this:
>
>
> PORT STATE SERVICE
> 53/tcp open domain
>
> 1029/tcp open ms-lsa
> 1032/tcp open iad3
>
> 3389/tcp open ms-term-serv
>
>
> Why would 1029 and 1032 need to be open from the outside?
>
> -Kill
>
>
> --
> If you spend more on coffee than on IT security, you will be hacked.
> What's more, you deserve to be hacked.
> -- former White House cybersecurity czar Richard Clarke
>

-- 
If you spend more on coffee than on IT security, you will be hacked.
What's more, you deserve to be hacked.
-- former White House cybersecurity czar Richard Clarke
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This List Sponsored by: Cenzic
Are you using SPI, Watchfire or WhiteHat?
Consider getting clear vision with Cenzic
See HOW Now with our 20/20 program!
http://www.cenzic.com/c/2020
------------------------------------------------------------------------


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Sat Apr 12 2008 - 10:57:54 EDT