From: Jason Chambers (jchambers@ucla.edu)
Date: Fri May 18 2007 - 17:26:08 EDT
killy wrote:
> ROFL, that is exactly what I was thinking.
>
> This is a sticky situation really.
>
> Jason,
>
> I have not always agreed with the idea that this is intercepting
> communications.
Well.. IANAL, but the way I read it if your looking at content then it
is. In the US at least.
> Now with that being said, to run some HIDS on you wireless connection
> is almost the same right?
I can't find the document at the moment, but I remember reading that
HIDS \ NIDS fall under the role of specialized devices because of the
intent. Maybe "Wall of Sheep" could be argued here :)
--Jason
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This List Sponsored by: Cenzic
Are you using SPI, Watchfire or WhiteHat?
Consider getting clear vision with Cenzic
See HOW Now with our 20/20 program!
http://www.cenzic.com/c/2020
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Sat Apr 12 2008 - 10:57:48 EDT