Re: What protocol to choose for a new fuzzer?

From: Chris Byrd (cbyrd01@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Feb 21 2007 - 10:57:33 EST


How about an IPv6 stack fuzzer? Most IPv6 implementations are pretty
new, and there's lots of potential for problems. Its also on by
default in new OSes. Anyone on list know of any IPv6 fuzzers out
there?

- Chris

On 2/20/07, jezzzz . <jezonthenet@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I have some time on my hands (about two months) to
> work on a new network protocol fuzzer which I intend
> to write in Python. I don't have much experience in
> Python but my intention is to learn it by writing the
> fuzzer. I am looking for a protocol which is
> interesting and does not yet have a fuzzer for it.
> IMAP and RIP for instance already seem to have
> fuzzers. Anyone any ideas for other protocols?
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
> http://new.mail.yahoo.com
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This List Sponsored by: Cenzic
>
> Need to secure your web apps?
> Cenzic Hailstorm finds vulnerabilities fast.
> Click the link to buy it, try it or download Hailstorm for FREE.
>
> http://www.cenzic.com/products_services/download_hailstorm.php?camp=701600000008bOW
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------
This List Sponsored by: Cenzic

Need to secure your web apps?
Cenzic Hailstorm finds vulnerabilities fast.
Click the link to buy it, try it or download Hailstorm for FREE.

http://www.cenzic.com/products_services/download_hailstorm.php?camp=701600000008bOW
------------------------------------------------------------------------



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Sat Apr 12 2008 - 10:57:36 EDT