Re: RE: l0phtcrack

From: wymerzp@sbu.edu
Date: Sun Oct 29 2006 - 23:06:10 EST

Next message: Gareth Davies: "Re: l0phtcrack"
Previous message: barcajax@gmail.com: "Need brute-force assistance"
Maybe in reply to: Steve Armstrong: "RE: l0phtcrack"
Next in thread: : "Re: l0phtcrack"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

('binary' encoding is not supported, stored as-is) Thanks to all who responded, I resolved the issue through sectools.org. It is an impressive tool; lc5 took mere seconds to break a user account on my computer(consisting of a word and one number) while (even under strong password auditing) with default settings lc5 didn't break my password for the admin account. NOTA BENE: Please don't assume that I feel impenetrable because of this, for there are more than one way to skin a cat as the addage goes. It is just very interesting to see the difference between a strong and a weak password! This really put things into perspective. Thanks again! Peace, Zach

------------------------------------------------------------------------
This List Sponsored by: Cenzic

Need to secure your web apps?
Cenzic Hailstorm finds vulnerabilities fast.
Click the link to buy it, try it or download Hailstorm for FREE.
http://www.cenzic.com/products_services/download_hailstorm.php?camp=701600000008bOW
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Next message: Gareth Davies: "Re: l0phtcrack"
Previous message: barcajax@gmail.com: "Need brute-force assistance"
Maybe in reply to: Steve Armstrong: "RE: l0phtcrack"
Next in thread: : "Re: l0phtcrack"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Sat Apr 12 2008 - 10:57:15 EDT