which freebsd/apache is exploitable at all?

From: Ingram (Vail@gmx.net)
Date: Wed Aug 21 2002 - 11:00:37 EDT

Next message: Muhammad Faisal Rauf Danka: "Re: XSS vulnerability on Apache Tomcat server"
Previous message: Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña: "Looks like a Borderware firewall (was Re: Device fingerprinting)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

greetings,

which Version of FreeBSD is really exploitable with the gobbles nosejob.c
exploit?
I tried it on several versions, but couldn´t manage to get shell. On OpenBSD
it´s
not a problem, i could even spawn a shell on 2.9 which is not "supported" by
nosejob/scalp.

I tried the following configs:

FreeBSD 4.4 RELEASE + Apache 1.3.22
FreeBSD 4.5 RELEASE + Apache 1.3.23
FreeBSD 4.5 RELEASE + Apache 1.3.24
FreeBSD 4.6 RELEASE + Apache 1.3.24
FreeBSD 4.6 RELEASE + Apache 1.3.25

I use the cygwin win32 port of the gobbles nosejob.

Could anybody point me to the right direction how to exploit the apache
chunked vuln
on FreeBSD and which version/parameters actually work?

thx in advantage
Ingram

-- 
GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet.
http://www.gmx.net
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided by the SecurityFocus Security Intelligence Alert (SIA)
Service. For more information on SecurityFocus' SIA service which
automatically alerts you to the latest security vulnerabilities please see:
https://alerts.securityfocus.com/

Next message: Muhammad Faisal Rauf Danka: "Re: XSS vulnerability on Apache Tomcat server"
Previous message: Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña: "Looks like a Borderware firewall (was Re: Device fingerprinting)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Sat Apr 12 2008 - 10:53:24 EDT