From: Bill Verzal (BVerzal@KOMATSUNA.COM)
Date: Mon Mar 29 2004 - 16:03:34 EST
Pretty close. If anything, the second would probably perform a *little*
better.
How many connections to the Shark do you have ? That would be the next
bottleneck.
BV
--------------------------------------------------------
"If everything is coming your way, then you are in the wrong lane"
Bill Verzal
AIX Administrator, Komatsu America
(847) 970-3726 - direct
(847) 970-4184 - fax
"Nguyen, Joseph"
<JNguyen@WM.COM>
Sent by: IBM AIX To
Discussion List aix-l@Princeton.EDU
<aix-l@Princeton. cc
EDU>
Subject
AIX jfs filesystem
03/29/2004 02:46
PM
Please respond to
IBM AIX
Discussion List
<aix-l@Princeton.
EDU>
Let say I have ten LUNs on 10 separate 8-packs on the shark. Each LUN is
50GB. Do the two options below give me the same I/O performance?
a) 10 filesystems, 50GB/fs, every fs stripped across all 10 LUNs
b) 1 filesystem, 500GB/fs, fs stripped across all 10 LUNs
Joseph
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Wed Apr 09 2008 - 22:17:47 EDT