From: Yi XIE (xieyi@CN.IBM.COM)
Date: Mon Dec 08 2003 - 09:22:35 EST
Jonathan,
Thanks a lot.
Andy, Xie Yi
eSM IT Architect
IBM Certified Advanced Technical Expert
Tel: 8621-63262288*2188
Cellur: 13801754025
e-mail: xieyi@cn.ibm.com
Jonathan Fosburgh <syjef@MAIL.MDANDERSON.ORG>
Sent by: IBM AIX Discussion List <aix-l@Princeton.EDU>
2003-12-04 05:04
Please respond to IBM AIX Discussion List
To: aix-l@Princeton.EDU
cc:
Subject: Re: MPIO and Vpath
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 03 December 2003 11:37 am, Yi XIE wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> When I use Shark, I always use Vpath. But now I use AIX 5.2 which
> default use MPIO(but I can also use Vpath in AIX5.2). But I found that
> MPIO hasn't takeover function which belongs to Vpath. During the test,
> when I disconnect a fiber channel, the I/O cannot switch to another
fiber
> channel. Does anyone know if this sympton is true? Thanks.
>
Well, first of all SDD and MPIO cannot coexist. Second, MPIO for 2105
requires a special version of 2105.rte (available from storage.ibm.com)
that
cannot coexist with the 2105.rte for SDD. With those two points out of
the
way, here are the issues as I am familiar with them. Native MPIO is not
as
flexible as SDD, the way it handles load-balancing is strictly
round-robin,
but I think that SDD defaults (on AIX) to a different algorithm. More
importantly, according to support, MPIO does not currently support
concurrent
code loads on the Shark. That killed using MPIO for us. I was looking at
it
for my new systems until I found out about that.
- --
Jonathan Fosburgh
AIX and Storage Administrator
UT MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, TX
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQE/zk/UqUvQmqp7omYRAs87AJ0aX5gVBNIAIQ7rn4Q2cgLgnnTXKACfYDtk
sSSZQGqPYOAFqj2A5UpuLRU=
=jgmz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Wed Apr 09 2008 - 22:17:23 EDT