From: Bob.Kelley@BRINKSINC.COM
Date: Thu Nov 20 2003 - 15:37:57 EST
Thanks for that John
I forgot to mention this is a 5.1 setup
Bobby Kelley Jr.
972-877-5341
|---------+---------------------------->
| | John Jolet |
| | <john.jolet@FXFN.|
| | COM> |
| | Sent by: IBM AIX |
| | Discussion List |
| | <aix-l@Princeton.|
| | EDU> |
| | |
| | |
| | 11/20/2003 02:32 |
| | PM |
| | Please respond to|
| | IBM AIX |
| | Discussion List |
| | |
|---------+---------------------------->
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| |
| To: aix-l@Princeton.EDU |
| cc: |
| Subject: Re: concurrent volume groups |
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
when i tried to set up a concurrent vg, it complained about certain hacmp
filesets. i don't know how far into hacmp you need to go, but you need
some things.
-----Original Message-----
From: IBM AIX Discussion List [mailto:aix-l@Princeton.EDU]On Behalf Of
Bob.Kelley@BRINKSINC.COM
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 2:00 PM
To: aix-l@Princeton.EDU
Subject: concurrent volume groups
Anyone know if concurrent volume groups can be used now without HACMP
managing the data access? Can I use raw non-SSA SAN volumes?
What we're trying to accomplish is two Oracle database servers with a
common shared database, load balanced on the front end. Any ideas or
experiences would be appreciated?
Bobby Kelley Jr.
972-877-5341
NOTICE TO BRINK'S EMPLOYEES:
All electronic mail communications composed, sent, received or stored on or
through Brink's equipment are subject to the Brink's Electronic
Communications Policy. Employees should have no expectation of privacy in
their use of the Company's electronic mail system.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Wed Apr 09 2008 - 22:17:22 EDT