From: Rod Jenkins (RodJ@IOWATELECOM.COM)
Date: Wed Jun 04 2003 - 12:02:40 EDT
We just went through this exercise. We had EMC, IBM, and StorageTek to
choose from. The long and the short of it was we went with EMC CX600.
FastT500 Pros: Provided by IBM
FastT500 Cons: Did not support all of our OS's, no synchronous replication
solution.
If you want more detail let me know.
Rod Jenkins
UNIX Administrator
Iowa Telecom
IBM Certified Specialist: pSeries AIX System Administration
-----Original Message-----
From: Patrick B. O'Brien [mailto:pobrien@DOIT.NV.GOV]
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 12:09 PM
To: aix-l@Princeton.EDU
Subject: IBM FastT600 Storage Server
Anybody out there using an IBM FastT600 Storage Server? I guess this is the
next generation SSA Box.
We are trying to decide what might be better, EMC or the IBM FastT600
Storage Server. Costs are always a hot topic. Any experiences or thoughts
would be great!
TIA.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Wed Apr 09 2008 - 22:16:54 EDT